These elements would not use as mentioned in the help (beam188) a simple formula – they use numerical integration as mentioned briefly in help.
So very different to this simple matrix found in handbooks – if you want to compare these matrices you would need to use the old legacy beam4 elements that do not use numerical integration but more “ready matrices” like you shown.
Below is a 10 m long beam with a square beam section (1m x 1m) represented by a single beam4 element. The local element matrix is then as extpected per “handbook matrix” found in textbooks
All the best
Please Login to Report Topic
Please Login to Share Feed
New Post - Reply To: Why K and M Matrices of Beam188 looks different than traditional theory ?
You are navigating away from the AIS Discovery experience