August 16, 2023 at 2:52 pmSimranjeet SinghSubscriber
I am attempting a steady-state simulation on a nozzle using inlet, outlet, far wall, and symmetry boundary conditions. Both the inlet and outlet are specified as pressure boundary conditions. While I can successfully run the simulation using a planar 2D space, I encounter an issue when switching to an axisymmetric setup. In this case, the gas seems to be unable to exit the thruster nozzle. The simulation involves nitrogen as the medium. I appreciate your assistance and insights.
August 16, 2023 at 4:25 pmRobAnsys Employee
For pressure in & out the mass flow becomes part of the solution, so you need additional care with the initial conditions. That doesn't alter the converged solution but does alter the convergence: you may not have a converged solution. That's also the Mach number, what do the velocity & pressure fields look like?
August 17, 2023 at 7:30 amSimranjeet SinghSubscriber
Thank you, Rob, for your response.
You’re correct, I haven’t achieved a converged solution yet. In addition to that, I’m observing reversed flows after just 230 iterations out of the total 3000 iterations. Interestingly, the planar 2D simulation doesn’t converge either even when run for 3000 iterations. Nonetheless, it does provide me with some results that I can compare.
August 17, 2023 at 1:47 pmRobAnsys Employee
2d planar is a slot, axi-symmetric will be a hole so the areas are very different. How much mesh is there in the throat? Did you patch the domain core region with pressure & velocity to give the solver some help?
August 17, 2023 at 3:09 pmSimranjeet SinghSubscriber
I’ve implemented edge sizing at the throat of the nozzle, utilizing 10 divisions to refine the mesh in that critical region. For the initialization, I opted for the ‘Standard Initialization’ method and computed the initial conditions based on the ‘Inlet’ boundary condition. As a result of this approach, I’ve confirmed that the pressure and velocity values closely align with the analytical calculations I performed. This gives me confidence in the accuracy of the initial setup.
August 17, 2023 at 3:33 pmRobAnsys Employee
Have a look at the Patch tools.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Boost Ansys Fluent Simulations with AWS
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) helps engineers design products in which the flow of fluid components is a significant challenge. These different use cases often require large complex models to solve on a traditional workstation. Click here to join this event to learn how to leverage Ansys Fluids on the cloud, thanks to Ansys Gateway powered by AWS.
Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- Floating point exception in Fluent
- What are the differences between CFX and Fluent?
- Heat transfer coefficient
- Difference between K-epsilon and K-omega Turbulence Model
- Getting graph and tabular data from result in workbench mechanical
- The solver failed with a non-zero exit code of : 2
- Suppress Fluent to open with GUI while performing in journal file
- Mesh Interfaces in ANSYS FLUENT
- Time Step Size and Courant Number
- error: Received signal SIGSEGV
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.