December 19, 2022 at 2:20 pmhelp_meSubscriber
I have tried to do twisted pairs simulation by selecting the lines representing the centriod of the beams; i use beam element with quadratic shape function, linear material, Frictional contact 0.1 (coulomb friction)
BCs:i have applied on one end Ux, Uy, Uz, RX, RZ = 0 but on the other end Ux, Uy, RX, RZ = 0; so that i applied a displacement in z direction (loading from start point to 6 mm and unloading cycle back to start point mm); this BCs sre apllied on remote point which connect the two vertices of the cables side
but the solver was unable to converge? how can i solve this problem?
December 19, 2022 at 7:04 pmJohn DoyleAnsys Employee
This type of problem is always going to be a convergence challenge. Among the most common tips would be the follow:
- Turn on Autotime Stepping and use a generous number of substeps.
- Reduce contact stiffness by one or two orders of magnitude from the default.
- Switch to pure penalty and try exponential stiffness updating.
December 20, 2022 at 8:05 amhelp_meSubscriber
hi John, yes it is "Autotime -> on", I used for contact stiffness "faktor 0.1" und the formulation "pure penalty" but it didn't work.
December 19, 2022 at 8:43 pmpeteroznewmanSubscriber
I wonder if Explicit Dynamics can be helpful in this example?
December 20, 2022 at 8:08 amhelp_meSubscriber
I didn't try but what the different between static analyse and Explicit Dynamics?
December 20, 2022 at 10:17 amhelp_meSubscriber
thank you for your time and help; I have a quastion about Displacement:when I want to apply Displacement i.e. 4 mm what the different between this cases!!
1. apply Displacement (z=4) on one vertex
2. apply Displacement (z=4) on two verteces
3. apply remote point (z=4) on one vertex
4. apply remote point (z=4) on two verteces
where should I apply the displacement in my case?
December 20, 2022 at 12:41 pmpeteroznewmanSubscriber
Explicit Dynamics works by taking very small time steps to maintain equilibrium and so does not need to converge on equilibrium though iteration the way Static Structural does.
Explicit Dynamics has very robust contact detection which works more often than the contact in Static Structural.
December 20, 2022 at 1:04 pmhelp_meSubscriber
Thank you for your detailed explanation in both solvers; I'm trying out your suggestion on using Explicit Dynamics
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- Saving & sharing of Working project files in .wbpz format
- An Unknown error occurred during solution. Check the Solver Output…..
- Understanding Force Convergence Solution Output
- Solver Pivot Warning in Beam Element Model
- Colors and Mesh Display
- How to calculate the residual stress on a coating by Vickers indentation?
- whether have the difference between using contact and target bodies
- What is the difference between bonded contact region and fixed joint
- The solver engine was unable to converge on a solution for the nonlinear problem as constrained.
- User manual
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.