Fluids

Fluids

999999.mpt accept :error :accept failed: invalid argument

    • Bart
      Subscriber

      An error appears during the calculation. (SST K-W, UDRGM, Transient, V19.2)



    • Rob
      Ansys Employee

      And if you restart Fluent what happens? What changes when the time step updates?

    • Bart
      Subscriber

      The same error happened, even I tried to reboot the computer. Decreasing the time step size also cannot solve this problem, and i use the fixed time step size. As the time updated, the error occurred and I couldn't review the results.


      Kind regards.

    • DrAmine
      Ansys Employee
      Can you make test with 0 as number of parallel processes?
    • Bart
      Subscriber

      It didn't work.


    • Rob
      Ansys Employee

      It looks like the real gas model is trying to calculate density for 1 Pa: that's not going to be stable.  Have a very careful look at the mesh & model settings and (as a test) try with fixed density then ideal gas and see what happens. 

    • Bart
      Subscriber

      In this UDRGM, the energy equation is deactivated. If I write a UDRGM according to ANSYS help documentation,  what I should change are "double RKEOS_density", "double RKEOS_speed_of_sound", "double RKEOS_viscosity" and "double RKEOS_rho_p" and the others remain unchanged.


      Is this right?

    • DrAmine
      Ansys Employee
      You need to provide consistent material properties. My question why you need for the udrgm?
    • Bart
      Subscriber

      If i don't need the energy equation, can i use the same properties (specific_heat, enthalpy and so on) according to UDRGM example in ANSYS help documentation? Therefore, I just change the material properties (density, speed of sound and viscosity) which are temperature-independent.


      Sir, you suggested me to use UDRGM according to my previous disscussion.


      Kind regards.

    • Bart
      Subscriber

      If that, can the material properties (rho_p) neglect or return 0.0 ?

    • DrAmine
      Ansys Employee
      I would say provide all input required by udrgm. You can provide whatever you want even independent of temperature.
      You can make a test if you are not sure about switching off equation via using the examples in the manual in dummy case and turning off equation if energy
    • Bart
      Subscriber

      Thank you for your reply! I will try this. @abenhadj 


      Moreover, I tried to set a very small time step size, and increased the value of pre-sweeps of scalar parameters and coupled parameters to 1. The error disappeared and the calculation could be stable for a long time. However, the warning "absolute pressure limited to 1.000000e+00 in 1054 cells on zone 8" always existed. I am not sure whether this warning will affect the accuracy. @rwoolhou @abenhadj 


      Kind regards.

    • Rob
      Ansys Employee

      If you have pressure based properties having cells capped at 1Pa (ie near enough vacuum) is going to effect the result and needs sorting out. 

    • Bart
      Subscriber

      I found that the grids whose pressure were 1 Pa were adjacent to the wall and mostly located in the boundary layer. Does this mean to correction the wall fuction or the turbulent viscosity?

    • DrAmine
      Ansys Employee
      Have you done the test I suggested?
Viewing 14 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.