March 25, 2022 at 12:25 pmand93Subscriber
I am having some problems when simulating (FDTD) a silicon waveguide turn with some subwavelength structures at the side. I am using two ports. One for mode excitation and another to monitor the output. I am using a PML BC. All structures are extended through the PML region. The simulation appears to be running fine and the autoshutoff level drops down to around 1e-4, however it never reaches 1e-5 and at some point starts to rise unlimitedly. When observing the movie monitor, simulation appears physicaly correct and the light appears to be propagating as expected. Long after most of the light appears to be absorbed by the PML, the field around the input port starts to rise unlimitedly causing the simulation to diverge. I tried to change the PML profile to stable and in that case the simulation converges and the autoshutoff level of 1e-5 is reached. However in this case there apears to be a significant back reflection from the PML back into the waveguide that is rendering simulation results nonphysical. This reflection can also be seen on the movie monitor. The simulations take a significant amount of time and I am somewhat time limited. Since I am trying to avoid extensive convergence testing, I decided to ask here first whether anyone would have an insight into my problem. My question is what do you think I should change first to achieve a stable simulation? Any help would be gratly appreciated.
AndrazMarch 29, 2022 at 7:26 amGreg BaethgeAnsys Employee
Thanks for posting your question and apologies for the delayed response. Diverging simulations can be tricky to troubleshoot. Assuming you already looked at this page, a couple of things you can try:
As you already mentioned using the stabilized profile helps with the divergence, you can try and increase the number of PML layers to reduce the back reflection (downside is, it will make the simulation larger). Stabilized profile is typically less efficient, that's why y default, we already use a large number of layers (42) but it might not be enough.
With dispersive material, change the bandwidth of the material fit in the material explorer. Sometimes, this is enough to help with the stability.
I hope this will help!
October 9, 2022 at 9:13 am2052047SubscriberI meet the same problem , and when I use smaller dx dy dz, it diverges worse (auto shutoff level didn't decline) not even I use metal BC or use PML with more layers and reduce stability factor.I wonder if any solve the problemViewing 2 reply threads
Ansys Innovation Space
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.Trending discussions
- “Import optical generation” or “delta generation rate”?
- Why am I getting “process exited without calling finalize”, and how do I fix it?
- Error on Lumerical device
- Using a license file on a new license server
- Error: addfdtd is not a valid function or a variable name
- Ansys Insight: Diverging Simulations
- Ansys Insight: Transmission results greater than one
- Ansys Insight: About override mesh in FDTD: its use and settings
- Ansys Insight: Convergence issues in CHARGE
- Is there a Lumerical script command to output the Simulation and Memory requirements?
Top Rated Tags
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.Ansys does not support the usage of unauthorized Ansys software. Please visit www.ansys.com to obtain an official distribution.