-
-
August 11, 2018 at 6:22 am
yogeshr
SubscriberI am importing very thin tube for modal analysis from space claim to workbench , I want to know what is the accuracy of geometry in workbench . Or is there any setting ine has to set for using high accuracy geometry from space claim to workbench.
-
August 11, 2018 at 2:12 pm
peteroznewman
SubscriberIf the tube is a solid model, I recommend you create a Midsurface to replace the solid and use shell elements in Mechanical to do the Modal analysis. If you do that, the stiffness of the model will be accurate. If you use solid elements, you will have a risk of an overly stiff model unless you have a few elements through the thickness of the tube wall. This is not an issue once you have shell elements.
If you mesh the tube with linear elements, you will get a faceted model, which will lose the accuracy of the geometry. But the default mesh uses quadratic elements that follow the curvature of the tube more accurately. The higher the mesh density, the closer will be the accuracy of the mesh to the geometry.
-
August 11, 2018 at 3:03 pm
Sandeep Medikonda
Ansys EmployeeYogesh,
I recently came across this nice article which I thought explains accuracy in FEA very well.
Hope you find it useful.
Regards,
Sandeep
-
August 11, 2018 at 6:02 pm
yogeshr
Subscriber
@peterroznewman , thanks for your prompt reply , I am using solid elements with minimum two elements through thickness , I want to ascertain that whatever changes (microns 10) i am doing in thickness are reflected in analysis , one way of ascertaining was to check the change in weight which is reflected in the solution information. But I want to know is there any geometry import setting which can be checked to be sure whatever result I am getting is accurate ?
-
August 11, 2018 at 6:04 pm
yogeshr
SubscriberYes it is very useful , thanks . I am more interested in checking the geometry in workbench . Like we put dimension annotation in our spaceclaim model.
-
August 11, 2018 at 10:14 pm
peteroznewman
Subscriberyogeshr,
I know of no setting that can change the accuracy of geometry import. The originator of the geometry may have a setting to adjust accuracy. Sounds like you have a way to check that a 10 micron change made a difference in the mass.
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.

Ansys Blog
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- How to work with STL file?
- Using Symmetry in DesignModeler and Expanding the Results
- Rotate tool in ANSYS Design Modeler
- drawing a geometry by importing a table of points
- section plane
- material properties
- ANSYS FLUENT – Operation would result in non manifold bodies
- Geometry scaling
- Parameters not imported into Workbench 18.2 from Solidworks/Inventor
- Convert Surface body to solid
-
2524
-
2066
-
1279
-
1096
-
457
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.