September 4, 2018 at 5:29 amTayyipSubscriber
I can calculate aerodynamic damping as a function of ib phase angle in CFX for imported modeshapes. Those are work done by the fluid on the blades in units of Joule per vibration cycle. I have trouble in proper normalization of this damping for ANSYS forced response analyses. In the attached picture file, there are snapshots from 2 publications. There are two different normalizations, which are applied to ANSYS aeromechanics (harmonic balance analysis for forced response). The difference is actually a factor of "2*pi" as one defines mode frequency as rad/sec, and another defines it as 1/s. Which one is true for the specific forced response analyses implemented in ANSYS?
September 5, 2018 at 2:22 pmBill HolmesAnsys Employee
I think these two equations are showing something slightly different. In the Durham paper, they are computing a (critical) aerodynamic damping ratio and in the PCA/ANSYS paper they are computing an aerodynamic damping coefficient.
We typically don't recommend using the work per cycle or aero damping directly for forced response calculations, since you will lose the stiffness component. You would be best off to follow the procedures shown in this section of the help documentation:
But if that caveat does not scare you, then you could use work per cycle. In that case what ANSYS is going to need for the forced response calculation is the modal force. The relationship for this as shown in the help documentation is
Modal Force = -Wcyc/(PI*scaling)
There is no 2 with the PI, as it is cancelled out in the calculations between Wcyc, critical damping, and modal force.
The scaling is essentially undoing any scaling that happened between structural and CFD.
September 11, 2018 at 11:15 amTayyipSubscriber
Thank you so much for your help.
April 3, 2020 at 3:13 pmJiqingSubscriber
I want to know how to set the normalized value in CFX to calculate the aerodynamic damping. As shown in the picture attached below, the value set in Normalization is used to normalize the aerodynamic work per cycle. According to the formula shown in the first picture attached by Tayyip, this value should be the denominator of the formula. So how to calculate value? Is it based the Modal Analysis?
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Boost Ansys Fluent Simulations with AWS
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) helps engineers design products in which the flow of fluid components is a significant challenge. These different use cases often require large complex models to solve on a traditional workstation. Click here to join this event to learn how to leverage Ansys Fluids on the cloud, thanks to Ansys Gateway powered by AWS.
Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- Suppress Fluent to open with GUI while performing in journal file
- Floating point exception in Fluent
- What are the differences between CFX and Fluent?
- Heat transfer coefficient
- Getting graph and tabular data from result in workbench mechanical
- The solver failed with a non-zero exit code of : 2
- Difference between K-epsilon and K-omega Turbulence Model
- Time Step Size and Courant Number
- Mesh Interfaces in ANSYS FLUENT
- error in cfd post
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.