-
-
September 13, 2018 at 8:38 pm
aCVP
SubscriberHi all - I have a question about ANSYS Discovery Live.
I was told that Discovery Live is not good for blood flow simulations. However, I found an article of a Discovery Live competition where someone looked at vorticity/thrombus formation. Here is the article:
https://www.ansys-blog.com/winner-discovery-live-design-competition-may-save-lives/
I would love to be able to use Discovery Live in our blood flow simulations, but I would like to know the accuracy in comparison to Fluent.
Any thoughts would be appreciated!
Thanks!
-
September 13, 2018 at 8:55 pm
aCVP
SubscriberTo provide more information: I will be looking at blood flow within ventricles.
-
September 13, 2018 at 9:27 pm
jmccasli
Ansys EmployeeHello aginn,
Discovery Live is meant as a preliminary design tool in the very early stages of product design and development. It is great for detecting trends when making large-scale changes to a model, but it is not meant studying small scale details of a flow field. Here's a good example I heard from the Discovery Live product manager, when using DL for a multi-element airfoil study with a Formula 1 team: DL will do a good job at capturing whether or not total system drag goes up/down when moving the airfoils relative to one another. But it will not do a good job of capturing the detailed velocity profile or shear in narrow passages between airfoils.
Using this same line of thinking on your blood flow within ventricles, it is safe to say that DL can give you useful information about global velocity features and overall system pressure when changing X or Y inputs. But it would not be good to rely on the actual values of, e.g., ventricle wall shear for a certain design.
In short, DL is useful for making early design decisions. The key thing to remember here is that DL is meant to be used in complimentary fashion with Fluent, not as a replacement for Fluent. E.g., you could run 100 designs in DL very quickly, then the top 5 candidates could be run in Fluent for more detailed analysis.
I hope that helps.
Regards,
Jeremy
-
September 14, 2018 at 8:43 am
Rob
Ansys EmployeeDS also doesn't have the nonNewonian viscosity that you'll need as blood isn't a simple liquid (it's actually a slurry).
-
September 14, 2018 at 5:53 pm
aCVP
SubscriberCan anyone direct me to documentation about the numerical methods that DL uses? I would love to learn more about it.
-
September 17, 2018 at 4:25 pm
Rob
Ansys EmployeeIf it's not in the Help guide there's nothing we can add here: we're very limited what we can discuss on a public forum.
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.

Ansys Blog
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- Suppress Fluent to open with GUI while performing in journal file
- Floating point exception in Fluent
- What are the differences between CFX and Fluent?
- Heat transfer coefficient
- Getting graph and tabular data from result in workbench mechanical
- The solver failed with a non-zero exit code of : 2
- Difference between K-epsilon and K-omega Turbulence Model
- Time Step Size and Courant Number
- Mesh Interfaces in ANSYS FLUENT
- error in cfd post
-
2524
-
2066
-
1279
-
1096
-
459
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.