March 16, 2020 at 7:30 pmRajasekharSubscriber
we are simulating a multi species setup in our case. we have a room where the Supply volume flow rate is 10360 L/S. our extract volume flow rate is 9320 L/S. this is a fish selling shop. the main objective of this simulation is the maintain the Fish odor ppm in the desired level such that the people wont feel the fishy smell. we have enabled gravity, we have incorporated air and Trimethylamine as the mixture template in our case. Trimethylamine is the species which is emitted from the fish. this species causes fishy odor as per a lot of articles.
all the inputs related to source generation rate of TMA from fish from each selling Kiosk are provided (KIOSK= at this place the fishes are placed).
all the flow rates are provided in the word document for your reference.
all the geometrical details are also provided in the word document for your reference.
also attaching the case file link here (https://we.tl/t-wVaDGFztFy).
will anyone please check this case file and let us know if we have done anything wrong in this case file.
since the density of TMA is heavy compared to air and since we enabled the gravity in this case. the TMA concentration should not travel much in upward direction. in the current case the TMA is travelling up. will anyone please suggest us any alternatives in terms of design parameters etc. suggestions will be highly appreciated.
March 16, 2020 at 9:48 pmKarthik RAdministrator
As Ansys employees, we are not allowed to open any documents that are attached here on this community. This is where other members of the community can help. Please feel free to help Rajasekhar verify his simulation.
March 17, 2020 at 5:46 am
March 17, 2020 at 2:42 pmRobAnsys Employee
Looks OK for a species model. I assume you also have pressure bc's and aren't using fixed flow inlets and outlets? Is gravity defined in the correct direction?
For HVAC I prefer Body Force Weighted,
Run the model and then ask questions if the results aren't as expected.
March 17, 2020 at 5:52 pmKarthik RAdministrator
Just to add to what Rob is saying - why are some of your velocities negative normal to the boundary? Is this something intentional? Are you imposing a specific velocity as an outflow?
March 18, 2020 at 4:23 amRajasekharSubscriber
Hello Rwoolhou and Karthik,
Thankyou for your quick response. as per the initial design from the client there is a mass imbalance in the current case. so in order to maintain mass balance we have considered 3 door openings as leakages for remaining flowrate to go out from the domain. these 3 door openings are considered as pressure outlet boundary conditions in the model.
inshort we have velocity inlet boundary condition for volume inflow.
we have velocity inlet with negative sign at velocity outlet boundary condition.
the remaining flowrate is sent out of the domain by using pressure outllet bc along three doors.
please let me know if you need more info on this
i have one more quire. i have attached a molar concentration image in this. please refer that. please find the question in the image itself.
March 18, 2020 at 5:18 pmKarthik RAdministrator
It is fairly unconventional to use negative velocity at the outlet to prescribe a certain mass flow rate at these boundaries. But, if this is something that you need to impose in order to close your problem properly, please go ahead and do that. Since you have more than one outlet, perhaps, it is okay to do what you're doing.
Regarding your other question - do the holes appear as part of your contour plot? Is this an artifact of post-processing? Or is this something that you are intending to model? What is the range of your legend? Is it based on 'Global Range'?
March 20, 2020 at 4:35 pmRajasekharSubscriber
Thanks a lot for your instant support. in the above problem it self we are supplying a species with total mass flow rate of 1777 mg/hr and my extract system is extracting 649620 mg/hr. will you please tell me what is the underlying physics behind it.
March 20, 2020 at 5:24 pmKarthik RAdministrator
If you have a closed system and your extraction rate is higher than the feeding rate, you could get into compressibility effects as the air starts to get thin. If your computational domain has opening (similar to your domain) and you are treating the fluid as incompressible, this is a strong possibility that you will get inflow from other boundaries such that your inflow rate matches your outflow.
Again, this is just a speculation based on what I can gather about your problem from the write-ups you have provided. Please feel free to run and analyse your results and let us know if you find anything amiss.
March 20, 2020 at 6:54 pmRajasekharSubscriber
Thanks for your explanation, actually my previous request was to help me to understand why my TMA species is extraction rate is higher compared to my source generation rate.
for instance my source generation (TMA) rate is x kg/s and my tma extraction rate is 10 times of x kg/s. for better understanding please read the below explanation.
I have one question when I analyze the results based on my previous case and data file, I found very strange that the total mass flow rate of TMA species coming from emitting surfaces is 4.9366 e -07 kg/sec (1777.17 mg/hr) which is matching the hand calculation that I defined but when I calculate the mass flow rate of TMA at the extracted surface I got 0.000228 kg/sec (820800 mg/hr), a big difference between the inlet and extract. It seems like the species is generating within the domain. Please find the below snapshots. I am enclosing we transfer link for my case and data file for your reference.
Area weighted average (mass fraction of tma) = mass of tma/ mass of air = 0.00002091. see Figure 1
Mass flow rate of tma = 0.00002091* mass flow rate of air (eq 1)
Total mass flow rate from the extracted surfaces = mass flow rate of air + mass flow rate of tma (figure 2)
mass flow rate of air = total mass flow rate - mass flow rate of tma (eq 2)
put value of mass flow rate of air from eq 2 to eq 1
mass flow rate of tma = 0.00002091 * (total mass flow rate – mass flow rate of tma)
mass flow rate of tma = 0.00002091 *(10.907 – mass flow rate of tma)
mass flow rate of tma = 0.000228 kg/sec = 820800 mg/hr
(link for case and data file)
Please have a look, is this because of mesh or any other reason.
March 20, 2020 at 7:02 pm
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Simulation World 2022
Check out more than 70 different sessions now available on demand. Get inspired as you hear from visionary companies, leading researchers and educators from around the globe on a variety of topics from life-saving improvements in healthcare, to bold new realities of space travel. Take a leap of certainty and check out a session today here.
Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- Suppress Fluent to open with GUI while performing in journal file
- Heat transfer coefficient
- What are the differences between CFX and Fluent?
- Floating point exception in Fluent
- The solver failed with a non-zero exit code of : 2
- Getting graph and tabular data from result in workbench mechanical
- Difference between K-epsilon and K-omega Turbulence Model
- Time Step Size and Courant Number
- Mesh Interfaces in ANSYS FLUENT
- error in cfd post
© 2022 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.