-
-
November 13, 2018 at 8:33 pm
kjohnson10
SubscriberGood Afternoon,
I am running an antenna simulation much smaller than my typical simulation size (so I think), but I keep getting an error saying that I am running out of memory.
I have attached images for all the information I deemed pertinent for troubleshooting this issue.
If anyone could assist me in solving this issue, I would certainly appreciate it.
Respectfully,
Kerry Johnson
-
November 13, 2018 at 9:47 pm
Peter Serano
Ansys EmployeeHi Kerry,
What would be more helpful is the 'Profile' and 'Mesh Statistics' information which can be found by right clicking on 'Results' in the project tree and clicking 'Solution Data'. Can you please post this information?
-
November 15, 2018 at 7:09 pm
kjohnson10
SubscriberI got my simulation to run by upping the number of cores allowable for the simulation.
Aside from that, the only change I made was that I made my open region at the central frequency of my sweep. However, this drastically changed my results for the worse. is there a rule of thumb for implementing open regions for radiation boundaries?
-
November 21, 2018 at 7:14 pm
Peter Serano
Ansys EmployeeHi Kerry,
The radiation boundary should be at least lambda/2 away from any outer surface of your antenna (with lambda being based on the lowest frequency point in your sweep).
Instead of using an open region, I would recommend creating a box defined as vacuum with equal dimensions 'rad_box_size' equal to [lambda (at lowest freq point) + max antenna dimension (from the origin)]. Then set the X, Y, and Z lengths of the box to 'rad_box_size' and center it at coordinate '-rad_box_size/2,-rad_box_size/2,-rad_box_size/2' so that the box is centered around the isocenter (where your antenna should be placed).
After you make the box, press 'f' to go into face select mode and select all 6 faces of the box you just created and define the faces as a Radiation Boundary.
You can also now setup a parametric sweep of the variable 'rad_box_size' and see how it effects your results. You should see the sweeps start to converge to the same result as you increase the size of the box towards lambda.
Best,
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Boost Ansys Fluent Simulations with AWS
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) helps engineers design products in which the flow of fluid components is a significant challenge. These different use cases often require large complex models to solve on a traditional workstation. Click here to join this event to learn how to leverage Ansys Fluids on the cloud, thanks to Ansys Gateway powered by AWS.

Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.

Ansys Blog
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- simulation completed with execution error on server
- Signing up as ANSYS Support Coordinator
- How to export Ansys Maxwell simulation results for post-processing in matlab or in .csv file
- Maxwell, HFSS or Q3D?
- Unable to assign correctly the excitations in a coil
- Error
- Running ANSYS HFSS on the HPC (it runs on Linux only)
- Running ANSYS HFSS on multiple nodes on SLURM based cluster
- Intersect errors with model with complex structure
- Number of parallel paths in Ansys Maxwell
-
2706
-
2142
-
1355
-
1144
-
462
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.