April 2, 2020 at 7:25 pmj.drozdowskiSubscriber
Hello. I've got a question regarding load applying in workbench. Below you can find some picture showing my test model. It is simple deck stiffened with flat bars.There is a stiff crate laying on it. The only load is a dead load.
In this test model i made a contact between box and deck to clearly show what I'm looking for. It is often that the object which is loading the construction is much stiffer than the construction itself ( some cargo laying on deck or some very heavy maschine ). So after deflection the load is not "following" the deformation.
It is easy to use contact in this test model but if it would be real design with lot of different construction members it is impossible to analyze contact every time.
I'm wondering is it possible to delete crate from this model and replace it with distributet load which won't follow the deformation - to properly simulate what is really happening.
I assume that using force or pressure component is not an answer in this case. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
April 2, 2020 at 7:31 pmWenlongAnsys Employee
You can check remote force, with the behavior set to rigid. Please check out this relevant post: https://studentcommunity.ansys.com/thread/adding-load-to-2d-rigid-surface/?order=all#comment-cf24a20e-abe7-4c3d-a7c9-ab8e01488b00
- How to access Ansys Online Help Document
- How to show full resolution image
- How to use Google to search within Ansys Student Community
April 2, 2020 at 11:37 pmpeteroznewmanSubscriber
If you use just two lines of force, one for each edge of the box, those forces don't change direction or add any false bending moment to the deck as the deformation occurs.
April 3, 2020 at 1:40 pmj.drozdowskiSubscriber
Thank you Sirs very much for you responses.
I'm afraid that effect will be different. Using remote force component
it will connect point load with the surface through the RBE (rigid or deformable). But It will still follow the deformation. And what worse it will add extra stiffness to the surface which it is applied.
I know wat you mean. In this particular case it is quite easy to anticipate how the structure will deflect and where the load will be applied. But in some more complicated case with different loads and more complicated structure it won't be so easy.
My question is:
Is there any component or procedure in Ansys to apply equivalent load of the box weight targeting it to surface but taking into account the effect I described earlier. So this component should apply more load to more rigid region and less load to more flexible region. But maybe there is no such a thing and the proper distribution should be made by hand.
April 3, 2020 at 2:12 pmpeteroznewmanSubscriber
To get an accurate load distribution, use frictional contact between the bottom of the box and the deck, but that results in high computational effort, even when the box is a rigid body as there are many nodes on the deck that need to be checked.
To get low computational effort, with some loss of accuracy, apply four nodal forces equal to 1/4 of the weight of the box to nodes on the deck where the four corners of the box are located and don't have a box.
An intermediate position is to use frictional contact between just four deck nodes, one near each of the four corners, to the rigid box. That will be much less computational effort than the first case but more accurate than just using four forces.
April 3, 2020 at 6:21 pmWenlongAnsys Employee
Sorry I didn't read your post carefully and provided an unrelated response. I have a question about the crate shape, you mentioned in reality the crate shape can be complex, in that case, you will have to model the exact shape and define contact, right?
April 5, 2020 at 5:16 pmj.drozdowskiSubscriber
I would rather assume that the supporting construction can be more complex than in my test model so the deflection won't be so straightforward and area of contact is hard to predict. But you are absolutely right the crate also can be more complex or it can be also some complex-shape maschine loading a construction.
I just thought that maybe there is an easy tool to avoid contact in such a cases. But it seems that sometimes contact is a must.
Thank you Sirs for your suggestions.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Simulation World 2022
Check out more than 70 different sessions now available on demand. Get inspired as you hear from visionary companies, leading researchers and educators from around the globe on a variety of topics from life-saving improvements in healthcare, to bold new realities of space travel. Take a leap of certainty and check out a session today here.
Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- How to calculate the residual stress on a coating by Vickers indentation?
- An Unknown error occurred during solution. Check the Solver Output…..
- Saving & sharing of Working project files in .wbpz format
- Solver Pivot Warning in Beam Element Model
- Understanding Force Convergence Solution Output
- whether have the difference between using contact and target bodies
- Colors and Mesh Display
- The solver engine was unable to converge on a solution for the nonlinear problem as constrained.
- Massive amount of memory (RAM) required for solve
- What is the difference between bonded contact region and fixed joint
© 2022 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.