May 25, 2021 at 10:36 amvishal_vashisthaSubscriber
Why this simple simulation doesn't converge even for a large simulation time of 3000 fs? I notice that it never reaches to auto shut level of 1e-5. Because of this, it shows me R and T both value close to 1 which is non-sense. R plus T must be equal to one here.
Even I try to add extra mesh but it never reached to 1e-5 shut level.
Also earlier, there was a time monitor which shows how the signal decays over time on a femtosecond scale, now if I look through the time monitor, it shows the E-fields over wavelength, how does it make sense to understand the signal convergence?
PS: This new page is even strange, I can't even upload the Lumerical file in its original format, I wish I could go back to previous KX support which was excellent.May 26, 2021 at 12:38 amKyleAnsys Employee
For some simulations (particularly simulations involving resonant structures), 3000 fs may not be a long enough time for the autoshutoff threshold to be reached. It's possible you may have to simply increase the simulation time for this simulation. It would be helpful if I could see the structure you are simulating, but Ansys staff are not permitted to download files from the ALF (as discussed in this post: https://forum.ansys.com/discussion/23093/why-ansys-employees-dont-download-attachments). Can you please include some screenshots of your simulation and structure?
Regarding the time monitor results, the electric field as a function of time is given as the "E" result:
In your screenshot it looks like you're viewing the "spectrum" result, which will give the Fourier transform of the time domain field results.
May 26, 2021 at 6:29 pmvishal_vashisthaSubscriberThanks for reply.
I think you are right. This is a strong resonance structure having an air hole in a 1-micron Si substrate (see xy view). When I see the E-field spectrum, it has a long tail even for 5000 fs but it does solve to give correct T and R values. But, this takes too much time, I wonder if we can do it faster because I am doing a sweeping analysis for period and hole.
I suppose we need some better PML to absorb the energy quickly so that the field decay soon.
I try to manipulate the PML as step PML and stabilized PML but the simulation time is more or less the same with a long heading tail of E-field.
May 27, 2021 at 1:13 amKyleAnsys Employee
This is a symmetric structure and source, so you could use symmetry boundary conditions to speed up this simulation. With this source polarization you could use anti-symmetric BCs in the x direction and symmetric BCs in the y direction (assuming the substrate is in the XY plane, I can't tell from your screenshot). Make sure you enable "allow symmetry on all boundaries" and set the symmetry BCs on both sides so the simulation is also periodic:
There is more information on symmetry BCs on this page:
Also, for a periodic simulation, you generally should use the "steep angle" PML profile, to absorb light in higher grating orders.
I am a bit surprised that the T and R results are both close to one, however. I would expect that they should be reasonable values, even if you end the simulation early. Can you please share a screenshot showing the placement of your monitors in the simulation?
Viewing 3 reply threads
Ansys Innovation Space
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Simulation World 2022
Check out more than 70 different sessions now available on demand. Get inspired as you hear from visionary companies, leading researchers and educators from around the globe on a variety of topics from life-saving improvements in healthcare, to bold new realities of space travel. Take a leap of certainty and check out a session today here.
Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.Trending discussions
- “Import optical generation” or “delta generation rate”?
- Why am I getting “process exited without calling finalize”, and how do I fix it?
- Error on Lumerical device
- Using a license file on a new license server
- Ansys Insight: Diverging Simulations
- Ansys Insight: About override mesh in FDTD: its use and settings
- Error: addfdtd is not a valid function or a variable name
- Ansys Insight: Transmission results greater than one
- Ansys Insight: Convergence issues in CHARGE
- Is there a Lumerical script command to output the Simulation and Memory requirements?
Top Rated Tags
© 2022 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.Ansys does not support the usage of unauthorized Ansys software. Please visit www.ansys.com to obtain an official distribution.