Photonics

Photonics

autoshutt doesn’t reach and showing wrong R and T spectra.

Tagged: ,

    • vishal_vashistha
      Subscriber

      Why this simple simulation doesn't converge even for a large simulation time of 3000 fs? I notice that it never reaches to auto shut level of 1e-5. Because of this, it shows me R and T both value close to 1 which is non-sense. R plus T must be equal to one here.

      Even I try to add extra mesh but it never reached to 1e-5 shut level.

      Also earlier, there was a time monitor which shows how the signal decays over time on a femtosecond scale, now if I look through the time monitor, it shows the E-fields over wavelength, how does it make sense to understand the signal convergence?

      PS: This new page is even strange, I can't even upload the Lumerical file in its original format, I wish I could go back to previous KX support which was excellent.

    • Kyle
      Ansys Employee

      For some simulations (particularly simulations involving resonant structures), 3000 fs may not be a long enough time for the autoshutoff threshold to be reached. It's possible you may have to simply increase the simulation time for this simulation. It would be helpful if I could see the structure you are simulating, but Ansys staff are not permitted to download files from the ALF (as discussed in this post: https://forum.ansys.com/discussion/23093/why-ansys-employees-dont-download-attachments). Can you please include some screenshots of your simulation and structure?
      Regarding the time monitor results, the electric field as a function of time is given as the "E" result:
      In your screenshot it looks like you're viewing the "spectrum" result, which will give the Fourier transform of the time domain field results.
    • vishal_vashistha
      Subscriber
      Thanks for reply.
      I think you are right. This is a strong resonance structure having an air hole in a 1-micron Si substrate (see xy view). When I see the E-field spectrum, it has a long tail even for 5000 fs but it does solve to give correct T and R values. But, this takes too much time, I wonder if we can do it faster because I am doing a sweeping analysis for period and hole.
      I suppose we need some better PML to absorb the energy quickly so that the field decay soon.
      I try to manipulate the PML as step PML and stabilized PML but the simulation time is more or less the same with a long heading tail of E-field.

    • Kyle
      Ansys Employee

      This is a symmetric structure and source, so you could use symmetry boundary conditions to speed up this simulation. With this source polarization you could use anti-symmetric BCs in the x direction and symmetric BCs in the y direction (assuming the substrate is in the XY plane, I can't tell from your screenshot). Make sure you enable "allow symmetry on all boundaries" and set the symmetry BCs on both sides so the simulation is also periodic:
      There is more information on symmetry BCs on this page:
      Also, for a periodic simulation, you generally should use the "steep angle" PML profile, to absorb light in higher grating orders.
      I am a bit surprised that the T and R results are both close to one, however. I would expect that they should be reasonable values, even if you end the simulation early. Can you please share a screenshot showing the placement of your monitors in the simulation?

Viewing 3 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.