-
-
June 15, 2022 at 9:45 am
kar.engg
SubscriberIn explicit analysis, I am performing an analysis for shock effect in a grass cutting blade when it is hit by a stone.
I had modeled several cases with different gap distances between blade and stone. Input is rotational velocity.
And, I could find that as the gap decreases the reaction force increases. And at zero gap, the reaction force is the highest.
Is this approach correct. How does the gap decides the reaction force? -
June 19, 2022 at 11:51 am
peteroznewman
SubscriberWhere are you measuring the reaction force?
Did you create Initital Conditions of rotational velocity?
Or does the blade start the simulation at rest and the rotational velocity ramps up from zero?
It would be helpful if you insert an image of the stone and blade. -
June 20, 2022 at 9:36 am
kar.engg
SubscriberThe reaction force is being measured at the stone's fixed support BC.
Yes. Initial rotational velocity is given as 3200 rpm.
Meanwhile, I had finished the analysis with 0 mm, 0.02 mm, 0.04 mm, 0.06 mm gaps too. The variation is of the order as 1513 N, 1569 N, 1807 N, 1469 N respectively. The gap seems to be varying the result without any particular order.
Attached the image of the system for reference.
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Boost Ansys Fluent Simulations with AWS
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) helps engineers design products in which the flow of fluid components is a significant challenge. These different use cases often require large complex models to solve on a traditional workstation. Click here to join this event to learn how to leverage Ansys Fluids on the cloud, thanks to Ansys Gateway powered by AWS.

Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.

Ansys Blog
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- explicit dynamics
- Explicit dynamics ERRORS
- turning simulation
- getting zero maximum and minimum stress value in explicit analysis
- How to figure out impact force in Explicit Dynamic Analysis
- How do get Full values instead of just minimum and maximum ?
- Monte Carlo Simulation
- Running an explicit dynamics simulation on a composite plate
- Euler Domain Restricting Simulation
- Which analysis to use for dynamic and quasi-static compression of auxetic structures?
-
3930
-
2649
-
1861
-
1272
-
610
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.