-
-
June 17, 2019 at 8:55 pm
andimens13
SubscriberPlease I am analysing an electrical cabinet using shell elements. The cabinet is mounted on top of an existing cabinet via 4 vertically oriented bolts at 4 corners, this one per corner. I had to change the geometry to mid-surfaces on spaceclaim before. However when I apply my fixed support at the bottom holes where the bolts are to be inserted in real life? I am getting huge stress values. I think this is more of stress singularity. Will I be right to apply the fixed support at the bottom of the cabinet instead of the hole edges at the corners of the cabinet. Will I be over simplifying the situation by doing that? I am suppose to apply 1g vertical, 1g lateral and 1g longitudinal acceleration on the cabinet to check for equivalent stress and deformation any where on the cabinet.
-
June 18, 2019 at 2:15 am
peteroznewman
SubscriberInserting an image of your geometry will give us better understanding of your model to make suggestions.
Does the bottom of the bottom cabinet have four feet that are bolted to the floor? If so, those four feet could be Fixed Supports.
How are you modeling the bolted connection between the top and bottom cabinets? There are several methods. A good method is to use a beam to represent each bolt at each corner. The reference end of the beam is scoped to the hole in the top of the bottom cabinet, the mobile end of the beam is scoped to the hole in the bottom of the top cabinet.
I don't understand why you would get a huge stress value. Again, an image would help.
-
June 18, 2019 at 8:31 am
andimens13
Subscriber -
June 20, 2019 at 7:09 pm
peteroznewman
Subscriber1) Avoid using Vertices as fixed supports because that can generate high stresses. Why would you not use the edge of the circular hole on the bottom of the bottom cabinet as the fixed support?
2) Even if there is a high stress on the vertices on the bottom side of the bottom cabinet, that won't affect the Beam Probe values of axial force and shear force going through the beams connecting the top cabinet to the top of the bottom cabinet.
It would be helpful if you would label holes on the image of the bottom cabinet. I don't know if I am looking at the top, the bottom or the side of the cabinet.
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Boost Ansys Fluent Simulations with AWS
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) helps engineers design products in which the flow of fluid components is a significant challenge. These different use cases often require large complex models to solve on a traditional workstation. Click here to join this event to learn how to leverage Ansys Fluids on the cloud, thanks to Ansys Gateway powered by AWS.

Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.

Ansys Blog
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- Saving & sharing of Working project files in .wbpz format
- Solver Pivot Warning in Beam Element Model
- Understanding Force Convergence Solution Output
- An Unknown error occurred during solution. Check the Solver Output…..
- What is the difference between bonded contact region and fixed joint
- whether have the difference between using contact and target bodies
- The solver engine was unable to converge on a solution for the nonlinear problem as constrained.
- User manual
- Colors and Mesh Display
- material damping and modal analysis
-
3834
-
2607
-
1853
-
1244
-
600
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.