February 17, 2021 at 11:06 pmmcgrat25Subscriber
I am modelling the blockage/sealing of a 'leak' within a water pipe using the insertion of elastomer particles into the pipe, which the find their way to the leak and 'plug' it. To do so, I am employing the macroscopic particle model (MPM), given that I have come across multiple descriptions of it being able to account for the blockage of fluid volume (I've seen images in guides published by Ansys showing its use to simulate the blocking of filter elements). A pressure differential between the inside of the pipe (which is at 2 bar gauge - assigned as a boundary condition to the main/larger pipe outlet) and leak/atmosphere (assigned as 0 bar to the second, smaller outlet) 'attracts' the particle towards the leak. An image of my simulation so far can be seen below, with a 6mm diameter particle being forced into the vicinity of the 5mm circular leak:February 18, 2021 at 5:07 pmSurya DebAnsys EmployeeHello, nYou might want to check the MPM Wall Deposition options. You can set a high value for the Minimum Drag Force for Particle Detachment .nYou can also check the velocity criterion for the wall deposition. Please check the following link.nArrayAnother technique could be to make the coefficient of restitutions for wall collisions very high. This will induce significant loss of energy for the MPM particle once it hits the wall. So a combination of these 2 techniques can ensure that the MPM does not lose contact with the wall thus ensuring a tight seal.nBut, you will need to test this out first. Also make sure that the drag forces are being estimated correctly on the MPM surface. Please have atleast 20 to 30 fluid cells resolving the MPM particle.nI hope this helps.nRegards,nSDnFebruary 18, 2021 at 5:19 pmSurya DebAnsys EmployeeJust a small correction, make the coefficient of restitution low and not high for the wall-particle collisions.nMarch 2, 2021 at 5:38 pmmcgrat25SubscribernTo use the 'particle deposition options' within mpm for this simulation, I want to assign only the 'leak' area of the model wall (the extrusion poking out at the top) as an area where the particle can be deposited. This is because the real world particles only 'deposit' when they are forced to deform into regions under high-pressure differential (such as leaks) - i.e. when hitting the rest of the pipe wall, they would simply 'bounce' off. nIn order to do so, the I method can see would be to create a new 'body' (which forms a singular 'part' alongside the main pipe body) for the leak, with 'deposition' only being set for this area. However, a potential issue I have encountered is the fact that the guide for the MPM model within 'help' for Ansys states that it cannot be used for 'mesh interfaces'. nAs a follow-up question, does a 'mesh interface' refer to any boundary between separate bodies within Ansys within this context, or does it specifically refer to the boundary condition 'mesh interface'? Or is essentially the two - i.e. all boundaries between geometric 'bodies' must have the 'mesh interface BC applied to them. If this is the case, does this mean MPM cannot be used in simulations containing separate bodies?nThanks again for your help.nViewing 3 reply threads
Ansys Innovation Space
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Boost Ansys Fluent Simulations with AWS
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) helps engineers design products in which the flow of fluid components is a significant challenge. These different use cases often require large complex models to solve on a traditional workstation. Click here to join this event to learn how to leverage Ansys Fluids on the cloud, thanks to Ansys Gateway powered by AWS.
Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.Trending discussions
- Suppress Fluent to open with GUI while performing in journal file
- Floating point exception in Fluent
- What are the differences between CFX and Fluent?
- Heat transfer coefficient
- Getting graph and tabular data from result in workbench mechanical
- The solver failed with a non-zero exit code of : 2
- Difference between K-epsilon and K-omega Turbulence Model
- Time Step Size and Courant Number
- Mesh Interfaces in ANSYS FLUENT
- error: Received signal SIGSEGV
Top Rated Tags
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.Ansys does not support the usage of unauthorized Ansys software. Please visit www.ansys.com to obtain an official distribution.