March 16, 2020 at 3:44 pmFS2020Subscriber
I am calculating an instationous water-air two-phase-flow with the eulerian-multi-phase model. The Volume Fraction Formulation is explicit and the time stepping method is calculated variable with a global Courant Number (CFL) of 1. While fluent is calculating the solution i can read in the Console: "Global Courant Number [variable Time Step Criteria]" (with the value of 1) and "Global Courant Number [Explicit VOF Criteria]" (with a value around 0.4). What is the difference between theses two CFL-Numbers?
Moreover I have read in the Fluent User-Guide that it is recommended to choose the CFL-Number as 2 and I am wondering if the Solution is even physical? I thought we need for a accurate time discetisation a cfl number equal or less than one?
Thank you so much for your help!
March 16, 2020 at 4:13 pmDrAmineAnsys Employee
One is flux based and other one is based on the formulation used in the VOF panel.
CFL<2 impliying 8 sub-steps for VOF explicit reconstruction if default VOFR CFL is kept to 0.25. That is fair enough. Fluent Pressure Based Solver is not explicit solver only the volume fraction can be solved in explicit fashion.
March 17, 2020 at 1:03 pmFS2020Subscriber
Thanks for your answer!
To be shure that I understand it right, I have a few more questions to this topic. Where is the difference between the VOF reconstruction equation and the continuity equation?
The conservation equations will be solved implicit for every global time step (resulting from CFL = 2) and the VOF reconstruction equation will be solved explicit with a much smaler time-"sub-step" (CFL = 0.25). Am I right so far? Which of these equations will be solved first and how is it possible to solve the VOF equation without knowing the results of the conservation equations (e.g. velocity, ... ) for this (small) time step?
I understand that the Global Courant Number [variable Time Step Criteria] results from this equation: CFL = u*delta t / delta x, but could you explain how the Global Courant Number [Explicit VOF Criteria] is calculated in the console? I do not understand why this CFL number is sometimes much smaler then the variable-time-step-Criteria-CFL and after a number of time steps both CFL-numbers have the same value.
Thank you very much!
March 17, 2020 at 1:17 pmDrAmineAnsys Employee
1) Yes.VOF equation is solved /Advected at the end.
2) The way the explicit one is calculated is documented. The variable one is based as I said on flux. The other one does depend on what kind you select.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Simulation World 2022
Check out more than 70 different sessions now available on demand. Get inspired as you hear from visionary companies, leading researchers and educators from around the globe on a variety of topics from life-saving improvements in healthcare, to bold new realities of space travel. Take a leap of certainty and check out a session today here.
Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- Suppress Fluent to open with GUI while performing in journal file
- Heat transfer coefficient
- What are the differences between CFX and Fluent?
- Floating point exception in Fluent
- The solver failed with a non-zero exit code of : 2
- Difference between K-epsilon and K-omega Turbulence Model
- Getting graph and tabular data from result in workbench mechanical
- Time Step Size and Courant Number
- Mesh Interfaces in ANSYS FLUENT
- error in cfd post
© 2022 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.