March 12, 2021 at 6:31 pmRyan_MitchellSubscriber
I am trying to compare the outlet temperature achieved by using different fluids in a pipe that is subject to cooling airflow.
I have set the mass flow rate of the fluid and the air as well as the temp at the inlets and to my knowledge everything else has been set up according to a tutorial that i have watched.
Please could someone a
dvise that when i change the material properties of the fluid the outlet temp does not change.
For info each time i run the simulation I just change the material properties of water liquid in fluent. I have used surface integrals and average static temp at fluid outlet to get the outlet temp.
I have tried to attach the file but it's too large. I have attached a photo where the boundary conditons import in a strange way from the meshing.March 15, 2021 at 4:45 amKeyur KanadeAnsys EmployeeYou may be having multi body part. For that you will need to use share topology. nPlease check following videosnnDM Share Share make sure that you have changed material of fluid in cell zone condition panel. By default it is air. nRegards,nKeyurnHow to access Ansys Online Help DocumentnHow to show full resolution imagenGuidelines on the Student CommunitynHow to use Google to search within Ansys Student CommunitynMarch 15, 2021 at 7:20 amRyan_MitchellSubscriberHi,nThanks for the reccomendations. The time to run iterations for this model was very long, perhaps this is a result of the topology? So I changed to a 2d asymetric model as created in this video, in which outlet temperatures of nanofluid are compared (these are the fluids I am comparing). I get the same issue. Very minimal teperature change. I have ehthylene gylcol and water as a base fluid and when comparing the results from that with the same fluid plus 2.0% copper nanopartciles the increase in delta t is very small in a turbulent flow condition. I have calculated the reynolds number and change the velocity of the different fluids as a function of this due to the varying density and viscocity. Any thoughts as to the small change? nMarch 15, 2021 at 7:20 amRyan_MitchellSubscriberMarch 15, 2021 at 4:02 pmRobAnsys EmployeeWas the DPM run coupled, ie interacting with the flow? Is that 2% copper by mass or volume? nMarch 15, 2021 at 4:05 pmRyan_MitchellSubscriberSorry rob I am new to the software as you can probably tell. You?ll have to elaborate on the DPM run? The 2% copper is by volume. I use a set of equations to calculate the nano fluid properties of density, thermal conductivity, specific heat capacity and viscosity. These are then entered into the material data base when creating the new fluid. nMarch 15, 2021 at 4:06 pmRobAnsys EmployeeDid you include the copper particles or just change the fluid properties? nMarch 15, 2021 at 4:08 pmRyan_MitchellSubscriberI just change the fluid properties as per my calculations for each different nano fluid I am using nMarch 15, 2021 at 5:24 pmRobAnsys EmployeeCan you confirm you've got the correct fluid (check Cell zones for fluid label). How much of a difference does the change make to the specific heat capacity? nMarch 15, 2021 at 5:30 pmMarch 15, 2021 at 5:35 pmRyan_MitchellSubscriberI have checked my results for the table above and they appear to be correct. nMarch 16, 2021 at 1:37 pmRyan_MitchellSubscriberJust to update this post I have increased the volume % of nanoparticles to 5% and acheived a 0.79 degree kelvin difference in temp with copper as the particle material. Using q = mcdelta t this leads to a 15% increase in heat transfer over that which is achieved by the pure Ethylene glycol fluid in the same pipe with a constant wall temperature applied. This is more in line with what I would expect. nMarch 16, 2021 at 2:59 pmRobAnsys EmployeeWith value changes like that make sure the mesh is refined and you're converging below the default criterion. nAlso check the temperature profile on the outlet: is heat transfer rate or cp what determines the outlet temperature? nViewing 12 reply threads
Ansys Innovation Space
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Boost Ansys Fluent Simulations with AWS
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) helps engineers design products in which the flow of fluid components is a significant challenge. These different use cases often require large complex models to solve on a traditional workstation. Click here to join this event to learn how to leverage Ansys Fluids on the cloud, thanks to Ansys Gateway powered by AWS.
Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.Trending discussions
- Suppress Fluent to open with GUI while performing in journal file
- Floating point exception in Fluent
- What are the differences between CFX and Fluent?
- Heat transfer coefficient
- Getting graph and tabular data from result in workbench mechanical
- The solver failed with a non-zero exit code of : 2
- Difference between K-epsilon and K-omega Turbulence Model
- Time Step Size and Courant Number
- Mesh Interfaces in ANSYS FLUENT
- error in cfd post
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.Ansys does not support the usage of unauthorized Ansys software. Please visit www.ansys.com to obtain an official distribution.