-
-
April 13, 2023 at 10:26 pm
Diane Salman
SubscriberHello,
I am running a static structural simulation on a 2D model of an upper airway in which spring connections represent the passive behavior of muscles and I am applying a negative pressure on the airway walls. I have noticed that when the units change in "Mechanical" and I solve the model again, the results I obtain are different. From what I can see, the issue seems to be that the spring connections are not working properly anymore.
For more clarity, when I created the geometry in DesignModeler, I used "millimeters". In Mechanical, when the units are in "millimeters" the solution is correct but when they change to "meters" the solution gives wrong results. Is there a reason for this to happen? Is it expected?
Best,
Diane
-
April 13, 2023 at 11:06 pm
peteroznewman
SubscriberHello Diane,
Did you use any Command Objects to define spring constants?
Command objects don’t have units, so if you defined a spring constant in a command object, it could be given a value of 10 for the spring stiffness. When solving in mm, that means 10 N/mm, but when solving in meters that spring stiffness is 10 N/m.
Whenever I create a Command Object that includes an input parameter that has units, I use the Analysis Setting to set the Solver Unit System to Manual and set the Unit to what I want. That way the Unit setting in Mechanical doesn’t change what the solver does.
Best regards,
Peter -
April 13, 2023 at 11:54 pm
Mike Rife
Ansys EmployeeHi Diane
An "Usual Suspect" would be stiffness terms, especially contact stiffness, that are being rounded off. On 'small' models that use MKS the stiffness' can get to be => 1E16 which can/will be rounded in double precision math. When changing unit systems down to match the natural bounds of the model, the stiffness' would then be much less than 1E16.
If your model has contact check the contact stiffness (in solution output) when using MKS units. There may also be an warning about these.
What results are changing? By how much?
If no contact, turn on the connections (Solution Information option) and see if there is a difference in the scoped region between the two unit systems.
Mike
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Boost Ansys Fluent Simulations with AWS
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) helps engineers design products in which the flow of fluid components is a significant challenge. These different use cases often require large complex models to solve on a traditional workstation. Click here to join this event to learn how to leverage Ansys Fluids on the cloud, thanks to Ansys Gateway powered by AWS.

Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.

Ansys Blog
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- Solver Pivot Warning in Beam Element Model
- Saving & sharing of Working project files in .wbpz format
- Understanding Force Convergence Solution Output
- An Unknown error occurred during solution. Check the Solver Output…..
- What is the difference between bonded contact region and fixed joint
- User manual
- The solver engine was unable to converge on a solution for the nonlinear problem as constrained.
- whether have the difference between using contact and target bodies
- material damping and modal analysis
- Colors and Mesh Display
-
5290
-
3311
-
2471
-
1308
-
1016
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.