Tagged: apdl, concrete, convergence, solid65, stress-strain-curve
-
-
August 30, 2022 at 12:36 pm
7121573
SubscriberHello everyone, I am currently working on an analysis of Rebar and Concrete bonds.
I am currently analyzing a Rebar and Concrete bond. I am using SOLID65 for the concrete elements, SOLID185 for the rebar elements, and CONTA174 and TARGE170 for the bond between the two. The analysis converges when SOLID65 is below APDL.
********************************************************************************
! Determination of elastic behavior of materials
Es = 27056 ! Modulus of Static Elasticity [MPa]
nus = 0.18 ! Poisson's ratio [-]
! SOLID65 value setting (TBDATA)
So = 0.35 ! Shear transfer coefficient of open cracks [-].
Sc = 1.0 ! Shear transfer coefficient of closed cracks [-].
Tc = 3.0 ! Uniaxial Tensile Cracking Stress [MPa]
Cc = -1 ! Uniaxial compressive failure stress [MPa]
! If the values of Tc and Cc are set to -1, the ability to crack and failure, respectively, is lost
!ET: Define element types from the element library
ET,MATID,SOLID65 ! Define
!MPTEMP: Define temperature of material properties
MPTEMP,,,,,,,, !?
MPTEMP,1,20 ! Define temperature as <20>
!MPDATA: Definition of material properties corresponding to the temperature set in MPTEMP
MPDATA,EX,MATID,,Es ! Define at temperature <20>
MPDATA,PRXY,MATID,,nus ! Define at temperature <20>
!TB: Activate data tables for entering material properties and special elements
TB,MISO,MATID,1,23,0 ! defined by <3> lines for <1> temperature
TBTEMP,20 ! Define temperature as <20>
! Define stress-strain curve
TBPT,,0.0000818796,2.2153333333
TBPT,,0.0001637591,4.4306666667
TBPT,,0.0002456387,6.6460000000
TBPT,,0.0003275182,8.8613333333
TBPT,,0.0004093978,11.0766666667
TBPT,,0.0005000000,13.2920000000
TBPT,,0.0005950000,15.5073333333
TBPT,,0.0007000000,17.7226666667
TBPT,,0.0008100000,19.9380000000
TBPT,,0.0009300000,22.1533333333
TBPT,,0.0010907468,24.3686666667
TBPT,,0.0012432646,26.5840000000
TBPT,,0.0014257215,28.7993333333
TBPT,,0.0016615890,31.0146666667
TBPT,,0.0022800000,33.2300000000
TBPT,,0.0023000000,33.2300000000
TBPT,,0.0024000000,33.2300000000
TBPT,,0.0025000000,33.2300000000
TBPT,,0.0026000000,33.2300000000
TBPT,,0.0027000000,33.2300000000
TBPT,,0.0028000000,33.2300000000
TBPT,,0.0029000000,33.2300000000
TBPT,,0.0030000000,33.2300000000
!TB: Activate data tables for entering material properties and special elements
TB,CONC,MATID,1,9, ! defines <9> values for <1> temperature
TBTEMP,20 ! Define temperature as <20>
TBDATA,1,So,Sc,Tc,Cc,, ! Define set values (5 to 9 are <0 (blank)>)
TBDATA,,,,,,,
********************************************************************************
However, for the following APDL, where neither the strength nor Young's modulus of the concrete has changed much, I get the error "Plasticity algorithm did not convert for element 63979,, material 1." and the analysis does not converge. (The study ends after about 1%.)
The element displayed in error is often on the concrete side of the interface between Rebar and concrete.
********************************************************************************
! Determination of elastic behavior of materials
Es = 26965.5110297712 ! Modulus of Static Elasticity [MPa]
nus = 0.18 ! Poisson's ratio [-]
!SOLID65 value setting (TBDATA)
So = 0.35! Shear transfer coefficient of open cracks [-].
Sc = 1.0 ! Shear transfer coefficient of closed cracks [-].
Tc = 3.0 ! Uniaxial Tensile Cracking Stress [MPa]
Cc = -1 ! Uniaxial compressive failure stress [MPa]
! If the values of Tc and Cc are set to -1, the ability to crack and failure, respectively, is lost
!ET: Define element types from the element library
ET,MATID,SOLID65 ! Define !MPTEMP: Define temperature of material properties
MPTEMP,,,,,,,, !?
MPTEMP,1,20 ! Define temperature as <20>
!MPDATA: Definition of material properties corresponding to the temperature set in MPTEMP
MPDATA,EX,MATID,,Es ! Define at temperature <20>
MPDATA,PRXY,MATID,,nus ! Define at temperature <20>
!TB: Activate data tables for entering material properties and special elements
TB,MISO,MATID,1,23,0 ! defined by <3> lines for <1> temperature
TBTEMP,20 ! Define temperature as <20>
! Define stress-strain curve
TBPT,,0.0000813328,2.1931800000
TBPT,,0.0001626656,4.3863600000
TBPT,,0.0002439983,6.5795400000
TBPT,,0.0003253311,8.7727200000
TBPT,,0.0004066639,10.9659000000
TBPT,,0.0004966611,13.1590800000
TBPT,,0.0005910267,15.3522600000
TBPT,,0.0006953255,17.5454400000
TBPT,,0.0008045910,19.7386200000
TBPT,,0.0009237896,21.9318000000
TBPT,,0.0010834630,24.1249800000
TBPT,,0.0012349623,26.3181600000
TBPT,,0.0014162008,28.5113400000
TBPT,,0.0016504932,30.7045200000
TBPT,,0.0022647746,32.8977000000
TBPT,,0.0022846410,32.8977000000
TBPT,,0.0023839732,32.8977000000
TBPT,,0.0024833054,32.8977000000
TBPT,,0.0025826376,32.8977000000
TBPT,,0.0026819699,32.8977000000
TBPT,,0.0027813021,32.8977000000
TBPT,,0.0028806343,32.8977000000
TBPT,,0.0029799665,32.8977000000
!TB: Activate data tables for entering material properties and special elements
TB,CONC,MATID,1,9, ! defines <9> values for <1> temperature
TBTEMP,20 ! Define temperature as <20>
TBDATA,1,So,Sc,Tc,Cc,, ! Define set values (5 to 9 are <0 (blank)>)
TBDATA,,,,,,,
********************************************************************************
If anyone knows the cause, I would appreciate it if you could let me know.
I appreciate any help you can provide.
-
September 5, 2022 at 8:40 am
Ashish Khemka
Ansys EmployeeHi,
For the error message:
Plasticity algorithm did not converge for element xxx
This message is displayed when Ansys is not able to converge plastic deformation increment. This generally occurs when the load is rapidly applied. I would suggest you apply load more slowly by increasing the number of substeps using the NSUBST command. // Command Reference // XV. N Commands // NSUBST.
Regards,
Ashish Khemka
-
September 5, 2022 at 9:58 am
7121573
SubscriberAshish Khemka Thank you very much for your advice on concrete analysis. What I am wondering this time is that one of the MISO models shown above errors rapidly, even though the behavior is almost the same. Also, even if I increase the sub-step to 10000, the error occurs at 1%. Why does only one of the MISO models converge? Any advice would be appreciated.
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.

Ansys Blog
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- Saving & sharing of Working project files in .wbpz format
- An Unknown error occurred during solution. Check the Solver Output…..
- Understanding Force Convergence Solution Output
- Solver Pivot Warning in Beam Element Model
- Colors and Mesh Display
- How to calculate the residual stress on a coating by Vickers indentation?
- whether have the difference between using contact and target bodies
- What is the difference between bonded contact region and fixed joint
- The solver engine was unable to converge on a solution for the nonlinear problem as constrained.
- User manual
-
2524
-
2066
-
1285
-
1096
-
459
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.