July 28, 2019 at 6:41 pmAslinnSubscriber
Hi, I am comparing different ways to connect the beam element and shell element. The example I used is to support a slab with beams. I used two ways to connect:
1. Set the beam and surface to share topology in SpaceClaim, and no connection setting in Mechanical;
2. No setting in Spaceclaim, but set the beams to be bonded with the surface in Mechanical.
It was found the deflection difference in beams is negligible, while the deflection different in the slab is about 6%.
Therefore, I wonder which is the most accurate way to simulate such a situation?
July 29, 2019 at 3:32 pmSandeep MedikondaAnsys Employee
You can also use define mesh Connections and define a Manual mesh Connection. You can also use Node Merge, but I often recommend against these 2 methods as it can cause extremely distorted meshes.
In your bonded contact definition, I would recommend you to double-check the constraint type and use MPC....This way you can couple your degrees of freedom accordingly and have more control.
To summarize, you can connect a Beam to Shell using the following ways:
- Multibody Part
- Mesh Connection
- Node Merge
- Bonded Contact
July 29, 2019 at 6:49 pm
July 29, 2019 at 7:08 pmSandeep MedikondaAnsys Employee
That snapshot is from an older version and it is also possibly dependent on the scoping element type/analysis even. Please refer to the help on the options you have in 2019R2.
So, when you are trying to couple U to ROT, this is nothing but to use Distributed, All Directions, i.e., Rotational DOFs are bound to Translational DOFs
July 30, 2019 at 8:59 pmAslinnSubscriber
Hi, thank you very much for the clarification. To expand, connections between different elements, such as connection beam element to shell element, beam element to solid element, shell element to solid element, etc., are essentially bounding the mesh nodes. Different results from different connection approach is coming from different mesh option. Is my understanding correct?
July 30, 2019 at 9:09 pmSandeep MedikondaAnsys Employee
Yes, Shell and Beam elements have 6 degrees of freedom (3 translation + 3 rotational), whereas solid elements have only 3 (translational only) degrees of freedom. The coupling with add constraints to account for any mismatch.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- Saving & sharing of Working project files in .wbpz format
- Understanding Force Convergence Solution Output
- An Unknown error occurred during solution. Check the Solver Output…..
- Solver Pivot Warning in Beam Element Model
- Colors and Mesh Display
- whether have the difference between using contact and target bodies
- How to calculate the residual stress on a coating by Vickers indentation?
- What is the difference between bonded contact region and fixed joint
- The solver engine was unable to converge on a solution for the nonlinear problem as constrained.
- User manual
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.