Photonics

Photonics

Consulting the dimension settings of FDTD simulation

    • ceshi xiazai
      Subscriber

      Dear all,

      I put a point DFT monitor to get the spectrum inside the pyramid cavity. I'm wondering why the intensity has a big difference between 2D and 3D FDTD region with everything else settings the same. Does the 2D FDTD region get a result by regarding the structure as a hexagonal prism rathan than a hexagonal pyramid ?

    • ceshi xiazai
      Subscriber

      For this case Whispering gallery modes of a microdisk – Ansys Optics

      2D FDTD region is conducted while the structure is a pillar. So does this structure be regarded as  an infinitely long prism?(because there is no PML restriction in the z axis。

      • ceshi xiazai
        Subscriber

        And I'm also wondering why a 2D FDTD simulation region was adopted in this case

    • Amrita Pati
      Ansys Employee

      Hi Ceshi,

      You can use 2D simulation region if the structure has a translational symmetry along one of the axes. In your case since the structure is not uniform along the third axis, a 2D simulation region should not be used. If it was a hexagonal prism of infinite length then 2D FDTD would have been accurate. So, for 2D simulation you can assume that the structure is infinitely long and uniform.

      Regards,
      Amrita

      • ceshi xiazai
        Subscriber

        Thanks for your nice reply! I have another question. For this case Whispering gallery modes of a microdisk – Ansys Optics

        the prism is not infinitely long(it seems to have a certain height),why can it use a 2D simulation region?

         

Viewing 2 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.