March 28, 2023 at 8:27 amVinay ShekharSubscriber
I am attempting to model a layered GFRP structure with curved surfaces. I chose to use layers of thin shells tied together with the CONTACT_AUTOMATIC_ONE_WAY_SURFACE_TO_SURFACE_TIEBREAK cards.
I generated the geometry for each layer in a CAD package, exported it as STEP files, and then meshed each layer inside LS-PrePost.
The current problem I am facing is that the due to the curvature of the structure, the shell layer offset is not exact. In this problem, I have set the layer offset at 0.64 mm, but the measured offset is between 0.63996 mm and 0.64005 mm. This fifth significant figure discrepancy is causing the tied contacts to fail prematurely with a number of initial penetration warnings from the LS-DYNA solver.
Any advice on how to tackle this problem would be greatly appreciated. Including the possibility of using other contact cards that can do the same job.
April 5, 2023 at 7:43 pmAndreas KoutrasAnsys Employee
Could you increase the contact thickness a bit further so that there is some initial penetration throughout the surface. To modify the contact thickness, you can use SAST or SBST on *CONTACT. I tried it with tiebreak OPTION=11 in MPP and seems to be working. Running a test with a flat contact surface will help confirm this.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Boost Ansys Fluent Simulations with AWS
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) helps engineers design products in which the flow of fluid components is a significant challenge. These different use cases often require large complex models to solve on a traditional workstation. Click here to join this event to learn how to leverage Ansys Fluids on the cloud, thanks to Ansys Gateway powered by AWS.
Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- explicit dynamics
- Explicit dynamics ERRORS
- turning simulation
- getting zero maximum and minimum stress value in explicit analysis
- How to figure out impact force in Explicit Dynamic Analysis
- Running an explicit dynamics simulation on a composite plate
- How do get Full values instead of just minimum and maximum ?
- Monte Carlo Simulation
- Euler Domain Restricting Simulation
- Which analysis to use for dynamic and quasi-static compression of auxetic structures?
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.