-
-
October 6, 2018 at 10:38 am
hugo CFD
SubscriberHello
When we are conducting a mesh convergence study, it is necessary to assign a theoretical convergence index. The observed convergence index is then calculated, based on the results obtained from the variables of interest. Due to different types of error, the order of convergence observed is often less than theoretical.
I got an order of convergence observed superior to theoretical. Is this a plausible result? What is the origin of this result?
With respect to the extrapolation of richarsdon, this is to calculate a value of the variable under study when the refinement of the mesh tends to zero. Does this mean that this value is the real value of the solution? or just the actual value of the numerical simulation?
Thank you
-
October 9, 2018 at 2:06 am
Karthik R
AdministratorHello,
Could you please elaborate on the problem your are trying to do mesh independence studies? What model are you using? Which modeling tool are you using?
Please provide us with more details to help us understand the context.
Thank you.
Best Regards,
Karthik
-
October 9, 2018 at 8:25 am
hugo CFD
SubscriberHello.
I'm simulating a flat plate heat exchanger, almost counter flow.
In the study of knit independence, I used the richardson method. The ratio between the dimension of the mesh element is 2. Three mesh sizes 0.5mm, 1mm, 2mm were studied. The shape of the elements used is hexagonal.
According to the variable in study, heat flux, the three meshes studied converge to the value extrapolated by the richardson method. However, what is the reason for the p-value, order of convergence is higher than the stimulated ratio? Is it supposed to be smaller due to the associated errors, or am I wrong?
Thanks
-
October 10, 2018 at 1:00 am
mcoderon
Ansys EmployeeHello,
If you are simulating a turbulent flow you need to be careful on how the mesh refinement modifies the y+ value at the wall. Changing the size of your mesh may drastically change the y+ value and your mesh may or may not verify the requirements of your turbulence model.
Let's say that hypothetically you want y+=1 and the coarser meshes do not verify that condition. The solutions are affected by a bad physics modeling and the extrapolation may give you unexpected results.
Regards,
Marco
-
October 10, 2018 at 8:29 am
hugo CFD
SubscriberNo. the regime is laminar.
What I want to clarify is not the extrapolated value. is the value of p, of the order of convergence being greater than the chosen ratio between meshes.
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.

Ansys Blog
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- ANSYS Workbench Measuring within Design
- how to improve the inflation quality at sharp corners?
- check element type
- The mesh file exporter could not resolve cyclic dependencies in overlapping contact regions error
- How to resolve Mesh Failure
- Meshing Error
- Error in meshing
- Conformal vs Non-Conformal Mesh
- execution error inside the mesher. The process suffered an unhandled exception or ran out of memory
- inflation created stairstep mesh at some location
-
2630
-
2110
-
1335
-
1110
-
461
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.