October 23, 2022 at 7:07 pmandrea giordanoSubscriber
I am running the static structural hyperelastic simulation of a soft wing, but I cannot reach convergence due to a "highly distorted element". Despite I have followed all of @peteroznewman on how to make hyperelastic simulations converge, it is difficult to mesh my domain with Solid185, and most of all my domain is not axis symmetric. THerefore, I cannot use Keyopt 6 or others. I tried many strategies, as forcing the mesh to use Solid185, changing my curved domain to a segmented one... However I still get the same error, despite the 100 substeps employed during simulation. Could anyone or maybe Peter help me? Thank you very much. I can share link with simulation archive:
October 24, 2022 at 12:29 ampeteroznewmanSubscriber
I’m looking at your model now, and thinking about ways to simplify the meshing.
The Inextensible layer has many holes. What is the function of the holes? Can the holes be eliminated from the geometry?
The inextensible layer is very thin. Could this thin solid layer be replaced with a surface model?
In pink are the cavities where the pressure is applied. In Static Structural, there is only pressure applied to the top side of the wing, is that to get it to change shape?
I noticed Frictionless contact used. Friction can help convergence. However, that won’t fix the highly distorted element error. Better element shapes may be what is needed.
One reason models fail to converge is due to mistakes in the material properties. Here is the Ecoflex 00-50 properties entered in the model.
Those numbers seem way too small. Were they entered in the wrong units and are off by a factor of 1 million? This would be the cause of the immediate error messages of highly distorted elements.
I found a Masters Thesis on this material. This has good information and you could use this Mooney-Rivlin data.
If you would like to discuss this further, I can set up a meeting where we talk and share our screens. I’m in the Eastern US Time Zone.
October 25, 2022 at 12:41 ampeteroznewmanSubscriber
I decided to apply Standard Earth Gravity to the wing. You can see how the Eco-Flex part of the wing sags by 13 mm at the trailing edge when there is no pressure in the wing.
When a pressure of 4.e-2 MPa is applied to the chamber on the top of the wing, the trailing edge goes down to 26 mm.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Simulation World 2022
Check out more than 70 different sessions now available on demand. Get inspired as you hear from visionary companies, leading researchers and educators from around the globe on a variety of topics from life-saving improvements in healthcare, to bold new realities of space travel. Take a leap of certainty and check out a session today here.
Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- How to calculate the residual stress on a coating by Vickers indentation?
- An Unknown error occurred during solution. Check the Solver Output…..
- Saving & sharing of Working project files in .wbpz format
- Solver Pivot Warning in Beam Element Model
- Understanding Force Convergence Solution Output
- Colors and Mesh Display
- whether have the difference between using contact and target bodies
- The solver engine was unable to converge on a solution for the nonlinear problem as constrained.
- What is the difference between bonded contact region and fixed joint
- Massive amount of memory (RAM) required for solve
© 2022 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.