August 8, 2017 at 7:59 pmkwl8rsSubscriber
I am modeling additional variable (AV) flow in a turbulent flume but have run into the problem of significant dissipation of the AV before it reaches the developed turbulent section of the flume. The velocity profile can be seen in the attached image and analyzing the AV concentration as a result of advection is the primary goal, so this poses a problem. I was hoping someone could give me advice on creating an internal inlet to release the additional variable inside the geometry rather than at the face inlet the water enters from. This would allow the additional variable to immediately interact with the turbulent environment rather than only encountering a developed boundary layer after 5 seconds of dissipiation. I've tried doing this by creating a plane inside the geometry, sketching a circular inlet, splitting it from the plane and making it a named selection, but the face split is superimposed onto the outer face of the flume where the initial water inlet is. Do you know of any way to create an internal inlet within a geometry?
Another idea someone told me is that water from the outlet can be used for the inlet, which would allow for a turbulent environment to be present in the entire plume through recirculation. Again I'm not sure if this can be done or what steps to take. Any advice would be appreciated.
August 10, 2017 at 7:41 pmVishal GanoreAnsys Employee
Hi, could you please share some snapshots of geometry after creating circular inlet just to understand what is happening exactly?
August 14, 2017 at 1:12 amkwl8rsSubscriber
I attached a few images of the geometry, additional variable concentration, and velocity field to get a feel for the project.
velocity field: you can see turbulence takes time to develop, so inserting the additional variable in the middle of the plume would create the most realistic model. I'm increasing the size of the domain to prevent the additional variable hitting the roof as well.
Thanks a lot for your help!
August 30, 2017 at 11:13 amHolger GrotjansAnsys Employee
Hi, did you consider to create a local source in the domain? So instead of an inlet you can create the AV at the required location by a source term.
August 30, 2017 at 2:35 pmkwl8rsSubscriber
Do you mean a sub-domain, point source, or source term? I'm using CFX so I'm not sure if I can create a source term.
Thanks for your help!
September 4, 2017 at 7:34 pmHolger GrotjansAnsys Employee
Well, sure you can easily create a source term in CFX. Just look at the documentation. For your application you can specify a domain source term specified by a CEL-function, making use of the step-function, to limit the source term to a specific region in the domain.
See section 220.127.116.11.2 in the CFX-Pre Users Guide.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- Suppress Fluent to open with GUI while performing in journal file
- Floating point exception in Fluent
- What are the differences between CFX and Fluent?
- Heat transfer coefficient
- Getting graph and tabular data from result in workbench mechanical
- The solver failed with a non-zero exit code of : 2
- Difference between K-epsilon and K-omega Turbulence Model
- Time Step Size and Courant Number
- Mesh Interfaces in ANSYS FLUENT
- error in cfd post
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.