-
-
June 7, 2023 at 10:31 am
SR786
SubscriberI am attempting to create a geometry with a magnetic rod stirrer (cylindrical) lying on the base of the reactor. I have used a boolean operation to subtract the rod from the reactor (at typical approach when modelling a stirred tank reactor) but I notice the cell skewness is very poor (0.99) meaning that I cannot run this mesh in ANSYS FLUENT as the simulation will blow up (even if I use PISO with skewness correction it doesn't work).
Does anyone have any suggestions on how to put the rod stirrer on the base of the reactor without the simulation blowing up (i.e., how to lower skewness of mesh)
-
June 7, 2023 at 1:03 pm
Federico Alzamora Previtali
SubscriberHello,
what did you use to create your Mesh? Where are those highly skewed cells? Is there a contact between the cylinder and the tank?
-
June 7, 2023 at 1:05 pm
SR786
SubscriberHi, I used ANSYS workbench to create my geometry and mesh. The skewed cells are located at the bottom of the tank, where the cylindrical stirrer meets the tank bottom
-
June 7, 2023 at 1:34 pm
Rob
Ansys EmployeeMove the mixer off the bottom of the tank by a small amount. In reality there will be a gap too, it's just rather small.
-
June 7, 2023 at 1:44 pm
SR786
SubscriberHi, I’ve tried doing this before (adjusting mixer by a small amount off the tank bottom) but the skewness is still poor (cells exceed skewness value of 1). The skewness only goes down if the rod is moved by a more noticeable gap (see image below) so that I can run simulation but as you can see at bottom (underneath stirrer) there is some flow when there shouldn’t be which is why I'm trying to get the rod touching the bottom
-
-
June 7, 2023 at 1:58 pm
Rob
Ansys EmployeeYou also need to have enough cells between the mixer and tank to let the mesher work. If you add inflation into the mix you're going to struggle without a very small minimum cell size.
-
June 7, 2023 at 2:04 pm
SR786
SubscriberOkay I see, so it's not possible to put the stirrer exactly at the base of the reactor due to overlapping cells?
-
June 7, 2023 at 2:22 pm
Rob
Ansys EmployeeOverlapping cells?
It's possible if you remove the sharp angle at the contact (look at how the automotive models do tyres) but the question is, how close do you need/want to be, and how will that effect your model? Or rather, can you afford the cell count relative to how much it's going to alter your solution.
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Boost Ansys Fluent Simulations with AWS
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) helps engineers design products in which the flow of fluid components is a significant challenge. These different use cases often require large complex models to solve on a traditional workstation. Click here to join this event to learn how to leverage Ansys Fluids on the cloud, thanks to Ansys Gateway powered by AWS.

Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.

Ansys Blog
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- Floating point exception in Fluent
- What are the differences between CFX and Fluent?
- Heat transfer coefficient
- Difference between K-epsilon and K-omega Turbulence Model
- Getting graph and tabular data from result in workbench mechanical
- The solver failed with a non-zero exit code of : 2
- Suppress Fluent to open with GUI while performing in journal file
- Mesh Interfaces in ANSYS FLUENT
- Time Step Size and Courant Number
- error: Received signal SIGSEGV
-
7584
-
4434
-
2951
-
1423
-
1322
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.