June 4, 2018 at 6:24 pmdan_123Subscriber
I am trying to simulate a cantilever cylinder subjected to a fluid flow (3D) using 2-way FSI. The expected displacement is less than 2 times the diameter of the cylinder (in my case, 10 mm) so I decided to simulate this displacement on the tip of the cylinder in still water to check the mesh deformation and this is where I'm trapped.
I separated the fluid in two zones: one around the cylinder to capture the boundary layer, and the other with the rest of the fluid. Both have cylindrical shapes. In dynamical mesh, I selected the smoothing (spring on all cells) and layering method. The spring method allowed me to select "Deform adjacent boundary layer with zone", which maintains the shape of the boundary layer zone.
i have two types of problems depending on if I select "share" or "group" between fluid zones in the "shared topology" section in Spaceclaim:
- The "boundary layer fluid" zone penetrates the "rest of the fluid" zone as the cylinder moves. It's like both zones were detached. I find this weird since its the same material (water) and fluent recognises it as an interface zone.
- The "rest of the fluid" zone moves along with the movement of the cylinder+"boundary layer" zone. It doesn't absorb it in the interface region between zones. I can see that the cells along the outer wall of my model absorb the motion, which is problematic. In addition, it seems that the layering method doesn't work since I don't see any splitting of collapsing cells throughout the movement.
Sorry for the long post. In summary, my goal is to create a mesh that is able to absorb the cylinder's movements and, to preserve a high quality boundary layer zone.
I attached an image to clarify my problem. This is just a test, that's why the mesh is not decent.
June 11, 2018 at 7:13 amKeyur KanadeAnsys Employee
Layering option will not be useful in your case. It is mainly for applications like piston-cylinder.
Please see below the example of setting up 2 way fsi problem.
June 18, 2018 at 9:21 amdan_123Subscriber
I've seen those videos before but they do not address the boundary layer problem I have.I think, for my case, I have two options
- Use the linearly elastic solid method and accept that the boundary layer around the cylinder will deform as the cylinder moves.
- Use the Spring method with the correct deformation parameters to avoid negative cell volumes. Use "deform adjacent boundary layer with zone for the fluid near the cylinder and use tetra mesh to absorb the deformation due to the cylinder movement.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Simulation World 2022
Check out more than 70 different sessions now available on demand. Get inspired as you hear from visionary companies, leading researchers and educators from around the globe on a variety of topics from life-saving improvements in healthcare, to bold new realities of space travel. Take a leap of certainty and check out a session today here.
Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- Suppress Fluent to open with GUI while performing in journal file
- Heat transfer coefficient
- What are the differences between CFX and Fluent?
- Floating point exception in Fluent
- The solver failed with a non-zero exit code of : 2
- Getting graph and tabular data from result in workbench mechanical
- Difference between K-epsilon and K-omega Turbulence Model
- Time Step Size and Courant Number
- Mesh Interfaces in ANSYS FLUENT
- error in cfd post
© 2022 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.