-
-
February 24, 2022 at 5:27 pm
MMary
SubscriberHi, in the Fluent Theory guide for v 2021 R2, under section 14.5.23 regarding DDPM it states "no Discrete Element Method (DEM) type collision treatment is applied, which would otherwise allow the efficient simulation of systems with a large number of particles". Does this mean that the DEM model cannot be used with DDPM?
February 25, 2022 at 7:38 amMurari Iyengar
Ansys EmployeeHi MMary DEM can be used with DDPM. By using DEM with DDPM, you can efficiently simulate systems with large number of particles.
February 25, 2022 at 5:09 pmMMary
SubscriberThanks for replying but if that's the case, what was meant by the above statement in the theory guide? I'm struggling to get DEM to work well with DDPM. It seems to run okay with DPM-DEM but not DDPM.
February 28, 2022 at 5:01 pmRob
Ansys EmployeeDDPM reverts to the Eulerian multiphase model as particle concentrations get high. I suspect that then means there are no particles for DEM collisions to occur. What are you trying to model?
February 28, 2022 at 5:26 pmMMary
SubscriberThanks for the reply. I'm modelling a closed cavity that's differentially heated with particles inside. The cavity is 10x10x10 mm and the particles are approx. 80 micrometers in diameter. The number of particles is typically 1000-10,000 but below 10% volume fraction. I am using DDPM to include the additional forces such as wall lubrication and also want to model collision. The particles form structures over time so I expect to find regions where particle concentration is high and other regions where it's low.
February 28, 2022 at 6:38 pmRob
Ansys EmployeeYou're in the grey area where Fluent's DEM isn't quite what you want, nor is DDPM or Eulerian. Have a look at Ansys Rocky coupled with Fluent: full DEM code with flow.
March 7, 2022 at 10:57 amMMary
SubscriberThank you. Is Ansys Rocky the same as Rocky DEM? Will it be available with an academic license?
March 7, 2022 at 2:29 pmRob
Ansys EmployeeIt's much the same code, but the version ID's are slightly out of sync, otherwise the interface is the same. No idea about the licencing as I just ask nicely and get whatever I want: your account manager will know.
Viewing 7 reply threads- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Ansys Innovation SpaceEarth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.
Ansys Blog
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
Trending discussions- Suppress Fluent to open with GUI while performing in journal file
- Floating point exception in Fluent
- What are the differences between CFX and Fluent?
- Heat transfer coefficient
- Getting graph and tabular data from result in workbench mechanical
- The solver failed with a non-zero exit code of : 2
- Difference between K-epsilon and K-omega Turbulence Model
- Time Step Size and Courant Number
- Mesh Interfaces in ANSYS FLUENT
- error in cfd post
Top Contributors-
2518
-
2064
-
1279
-
1094
-
456
Top Rated Tags© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.
Ansys does not support the usage of unauthorized Ansys software. Please visit www.ansys.com to obtain an official distribution.
-