Defining displacement constraint in lstasc

- June 20, 2022 at 10:08 am
  
  shk1048
  Subscriber
  
  In my case i have to restrict the displacement of the design part to 70mm in -z direction.
  Is it the correct way of defining the displacement constriant with minimum value as in the image
- June 23, 2022 at 12:43 am
  
  Imtiaz Gandikota
  Ansys Employee
  
  The contraint definition is correct but note that for nodout option, you have to specify a node id and displacement of that particular node is extracted. Since you are interested minimum displacment of the entire part, use d3plot option instead of nodout and specify part id(s). If you have a shell layer on top of design part, extracting min displacement of this shell part might be better than using design part.

Viewing 1 reply thread

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Ansys Innovation Space

Boost Ansys Fluent Simulations with AWS

Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) helps engineers design products in which the flow of fluid components is a significant challenge. These different use cases often require large complex models to solve on a traditional workstation. Click here to join this event to learn how to leverage Ansys Fluids on the cloud, thanks to Ansys Gateway powered by AWS.

Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series

The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.

Ansys Blog

Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.

Trending discussions