November 15, 2022 at 4:48 amcharles delepelaireSubscriber
hi all, ti try to use fluent, so i've tried to simulate flow fluid around a 2mm ball inside a 1 liter fluid box (100x100x100 mm)
ball is the ridiculous sized point at the center of the french flag
so... from here we can saw :
Cd of a smooth sphere around 0.47 at 5m/s and around 0.08 at 30m/s (see graph)
i've made a coefficient drag report file with it's plot with Y force Vector set to 1.
and the computation zone setted to my ball mesh
anyway i'm not able to find these values, and furthermore i got plethore amout of value dependant of intialisation caractéristic like hybrid/standard or pressure/density based... etc...
so what can i do to get repeatability, accuracy and "good" value with my simulation ?
November 15, 2022 at 6:35 amNikhil NaraleAnsys Employee
First thing, any reason for this? "plot with Y force Vector set to 1."
Is the fluid flowing along the Y axis?
November 15, 2022 at 7:06 amcharles delepelaireSubscriber
yes fluid flow along Y axis
November 15, 2022 at 6:42 amNikhil NaraleAnsys Employee
How good is your mesh near the object (ball)? Can you post the screen grab of the cut section of the volume mesh?
November 15, 2022 at 7:20 am
November 15, 2022 at 7:45 amNikhil NaraleAnsys Employee
This doesn’t look like a cut section. Did you add inflation layers?
Edit: Just saw the second image.
November 15, 2022 at 7:46 amcharles delepelaireSubscriber
no inflation no (adding too much node inside student license)
November 15, 2022 at 9:05 amNikhil NaraleAnsys Employee
For getting accurate results, it is very critical to have a mesh with good resolution and quality, at least near to the object of your interest. I would suggest you to look for aero meshing tutorials (airfoil for that matter) on the internet.
Also, keep a keen eye on the y+ value and make sure to maintain it as per the best practice. To know more, check this: 4.18.1. Overview (ansys.com)
If you are not able to access the link, please refer to this forum discussion: Using Help with links (ansys.com)
November 15, 2022 at 10:41 amcharles delepelaireSubscriber
ok so do you suggest to make it in 2D and analysis one vector at a time ?
is needed to get a symetric mesh ?
November 15, 2022 at 11:43 amRobAnsys Employee
2d has it's own problems as the wake separation may be asymmetrical and 2d-axisymmetric will mask that. Inflation shouldn't add too much to the cell count, and some careful decomposition should mean you can tet only the near sphere region and hex the rest.
Also, check sphere projected area and then read up on wind tunnel blockage factors. The domain looks fairly big relative to the sphere so you may be able to save some cells that way.
Finally, Student is intended to help you learn how to use the software. That includes realising you need a bigger mesh to get the right answer, and is why we also have Research licences.
November 18, 2022 at 9:20 am
November 18, 2022 at 10:36 amRobAnsys Employee
Use inflation and resolve the wake region. The graphs will show you the quality of the cells, what you're lacking is resolution of the boundary layer, separation and wake regions. Read the Body of Influence part here https://ansyshelp.ansys.com/account/Secured?returnurl=/Views/Secured/corp/v222/en/flu_ug/tgd_user_sf_types.html%23tgd_user_sf_boi to show how I'd mesh this. In Ansys Meshing the functions are there, but the images are better in the Fluent Meshing documentation.
The data you get from your model will not be accurate, but the general principle is shown.
November 18, 2022 at 11:11 am
November 18, 2022 at 12:02 pmRobAnsys Employee
Better. You may find you need more mesh via a BOI in the wake and more inflation layers but give it a go.
November 18, 2022 at 12:14 pm
November 18, 2022 at 1:36 pmRobAnsys Employee
Yes, like the image. You may not need to go as far downstream though.
No idea about the second bit of a quote. Two posts are fine.
November 18, 2022 at 2:43 pmcharles delepelaireSubscriber
ok but the probleme is how can i make a sphere of influence shaped like an ellipsoïd ?
November 18, 2022 at 2:48 pmRobAnsys Employee
Create a block & chamfer or curve & rotate: you do this in SpaceClaim or DesignModeler. As it's just a shape to guide the mesh refinement it's not required to be a perfect shape - a cuboid wedge will be fine.
November 19, 2022 at 4:20 pm
November 20, 2022 at 9:35 amcharles delepelaireSubscriber
November 21, 2022 at 1:18 pmcharles delepelaireSubscriber
[EDIT] is there a reason when i up my message it's not upped ?
November 22, 2022 at 11:53 amRobAnsys Employee
The system sort is new threads, or recent activity, you may have the wrong sorting option selected. As I also receive emails to tell me something has been added there's no need until you've not heard for a few days. Bumping after a day isn't appreciated, and will result in a miffed support engineer.
Given how coarse your new mesh is, how big a jump in cell size over the interface and how close it is to the region of interest, then no, it's not better. Have a look at the airfoil/aerofoil tutorials (might be NACA) and see how they've been meshed. Then read up on body of influence as you've split the zone out.
November 22, 2022 at 4:48 pm
November 22, 2022 at 4:51 pmRobAnsys Employee
Much better. The order shouldn't matter as the tool ought to take the smallest cell from each: it's why it takes some time before building the mesh.
November 22, 2022 at 4:54 pmcharles delepelaireSubscriber
i have this warning :
"Hard edges are not supported and may be ignored for pre-inflation, please check your model carefully."
is it important ?
November 22, 2022 at 4:57 pmRobAnsys Employee
Depends on where the hard edges are! A hard edge is an edge that doesn't form part of a surface perimeter: https://ansyshelp.ansys.com/account/Secured?returnurl=/Views/Secured/corp/v222/en/wb_dm/dm3dRepairHardEdges.html has an image showing what they are.
November 22, 2022 at 5:08 pmcharles delepelaireSubscriber
when i go to warning-> show problematic geometrie it's seems it's edge of my ball and edge outside my enclosure.
so will i try to make my fluid flow simulation anyway ?
November 22, 2022 at 5:31 pmRobAnsys Employee
If the mesh checks OK, yes. Warnings are something to check out and understand, they may not be important on any one occasion but MUST be checked.
November 22, 2022 at 5:57 pmcharles delepelaireSubscriber
this is the mesh quality :
Mesh Quality: Minimum Orthogonal Quality = 2.81099e-01 cell 61822 on zone 2 (ID: 61823 on partition: 0) at location (-2.28725e-02, -9.77421e-02, 6.04073e-03) Maximum Aspect Ratio = 8.38496e+00 cell 85645 on zone 2 (ID: 85646 on partition: 0) at location ( 1.20744e-03, -8.94578e-04, 3.44995e-04)
i maked it polyhedra, that’s good ?
November 23, 2022 at 9:47 amRobAnsys Employee
Cell quality is good, you'll know if the resolution is suitable once it's run.
November 23, 2022 at 1:59 pmcharles delepelaireSubscriber
so the probleme persist, why can't i get planned result ?
November 23, 2022 at 3:36 pmRobAnsys Employee
What are you seeing? Have you checked the reference values for the coefficients?
November 23, 2022 at 3:55 pmcharles delepelaireSubscriber
oops i forgot to edit my precedent post :
surface area : 3.14E-6 m² (section surface of my ball)
pressure : 101325 Pa
length :0.002 (diameter of my ball)
velocity : 5m/s
fluid velocity at inlet : 5m/s
density based and steady solver
all reamaining seems to be default
computation from my ball, 200 iterations (need i to add more until i get convergence ?)
i tried laminar and k-omega analysis with different option...
November 23, 2022 at 4:28 pmRobAnsys Employee
If the flow is over about Mach 3 then density based may be needed, but mostly pressure based is fine.
Convergence is recommended, otherwise the results tend to be a little wrong. That's why we have convergence residuals, and plot monitors.
November 27, 2022 at 1:48 amcharles delepelaireSubscriber
hi everyone, after few day to take fluent in hand i think i have finally understood why my first results went wrong.
i made enclosure, ball and BOI volume from Fusion 360, and export them to step files, so maybe there is a problem beetween fusion and fluent.
here are the fusions files : grosfaignan/3d-files (github.com)
if anyone can test them and help me.
but now i have another problem, i have a good drag coefficient, but in a wrong direction :
since i used spaceclaim 3d model, inlet and outlet are aligned to X and not to Y, so why getting good results along the wrong axis ? (in screenshot above, P drag coefficient in Y is around 0.49 for a 5m/s velocity at inlet, good result, wrong axis)
[EDIT]hahaha no, after a second test at 30m/s when i need to get a 0.1drag coef it seems it’s a false positive
[EDIT2] another misunderstood :
if i have flow velocity setted from inlet to outlet, so in this case parrallel to X axis, why Y and Z coefficient drag calculation are different ? see beelow :
Cd p = -16.622681
Cd p = 3.9403545
Cd p = -1.9091926
November 29, 2022 at 9:55 amRobAnsys Employee
Looking at the flow field the wake isn't aligned with the axis, that'll influence the coefficients, and mess with the convergence.
Step tends to transfer well, so unless the scaling went awry that shouldn't cause a problem.
November 29, 2022 at 1:36 pm
November 29, 2022 at 4:21 pmRobAnsys Employee
By looking: remember I've been doing this longer than you! Wakes, especially on spheres and cylinders tend not to be symmetric as you can get eddy shedding: look up von Karman vorticies.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Simulation World 2022
Check out more than 70 different sessions now available on demand. Get inspired as you hear from visionary companies, leading researchers and educators from around the globe on a variety of topics from life-saving improvements in healthcare, to bold new realities of space travel. Take a leap of certainty and check out a session today here.
Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- Suppress Fluent to open with GUI while performing in journal file
- Heat transfer coefficient
- What are the differences between CFX and Fluent?
- Floating point exception in Fluent
- The solver failed with a non-zero exit code of : 2
- Getting graph and tabular data from result in workbench mechanical
- Difference between K-epsilon and K-omega Turbulence Model
- Time Step Size and Courant Number
- Mesh Interfaces in ANSYS FLUENT
- error in cfd post
© 2022 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.