Eccentric failure problems in hydrostatic bearing simulation
-
-
Hello, I am currently doing simulation experiments on axial hydrostatic supports. Currently when I was modeling, I set different eccentric sizes for the movingwall. However, in the actual simulation experiment, the bearing capacity of the oil film did not change with the change of eccentric distance, which is contrary to what I have seen in the relevant literature. I used Workbench Mesh for meshing, the inlet pressure was set to 1.5e6Pa, and using the coupled algorithm, the movingwall moved at 2m/s. And the bearing capacity of movingwall is directly generated in the fluent results tab, and the results obtained are very small, even less than 10N. Is there a problem with my fluent settings or something else?
Looking forward to hearing from you, thank you. (Photo attached)
-
Here is my meshing picture
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Boost Ansys Fluent Simulations with AWS
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) helps engineers design products in which the flow of fluid components is a significant challenge. These different use cases often require large complex models to solve on a traditional workstation. Click here to join this event to learn how to leverage Ansys Fluids on the cloud, thanks to Ansys Gateway powered by AWS.
Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.
Ansys Blog
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
-
Rob
-
Guilin Sun
-
peteroznewman
-
DrAmine
-
Erik Kostson
You are navigating away from the AIS Discovery experience