-
-
November 9, 2018 at 9:11 pm
Dadojin
Subscriberhello,
it seems like the shown element's coordinate system ESYS in elements - particularry solid185 - is not correct. These elements have all the same ESYS, the same SECN for defined REINF264 elements, but the direction of the reinforcing elements itself is different.
Does anyone know how to fix this issue?
thank You
-
November 9, 2018 at 9:15 pm
Dadojin
Subscriberhere it even shows graphically htat the ESYS is the same:
shoud be the same also acording to ELIST command:
BUt the direction of REINF elements is different in both cases. Both reinf elements however have the same SECN, where the direction is defined. So it should be the same, but it is not.
When I change the ESYS of all solid185 elements (which I wish to reinforce) to a different one - and use the same defined direction for REINF264 elements for all these elements - it simply does not work and make a lot of mess:
-
November 9, 2018 at 9:16 pm
Dadojin
SubscriberI would be very gratefull if anyone could help to solve this problem, thanks
-
April 11, 2020 at 9:06 am
Dadojin
SubscriberI see my old question here... so I will answer myself:
this way it depends on the element definition in the given order of nodes - i j k l m n o p - not the coordinate system.
Much better way (not to mess up with elements) is to use mesh independent method of reinforcing
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.

Ansys Blog
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- ANSYS Workbench Measuring within Design
- how to improve the inflation quality at sharp corners?
- check element type
- The mesh file exporter could not resolve cyclic dependencies in overlapping contact regions error
- How to resolve Mesh Failure
- Meshing Error
- Error in meshing
- Conformal vs Non-Conformal Mesh
- execution error inside the mesher. The process suffered an unhandled exception or ran out of memory
- inflation created stairstep mesh at some location
-
2666
-
2120
-
1349
-
1130
-
461
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.