-
-
June 24, 2018 at 10:54 am
Rana Nasser
SubscriberHi everyone,
I have a problem in modeling the soil using mohr-coulomb material model. The behavior of the soil in the transient analysis is good, but when I'm trying to do a modal analysis to the same structure the error in the attached image appears although the model is not in a superposition case. A small trial model is attached in the archived file below.
Many thanks!
-
June 24, 2018 at 11:32 am
peteroznewman
SubscriberHi Rana,
The attached image shows a Warning, not an error. It is telling you that Modal analysis is a linear analysis, but you have nonlinear contact in your model. In order to do the linear analysis it has taken the initial contact status and used that for the Modal analysis. For frictional contact, if the contact was initially closed, then it behaves as bonded during the Modal analysis. If the contact was initially open, then there is no contact during the Modal analysis.
Kind regards,
Peter
-
June 24, 2018 at 1:06 pm
Rana Nasser
SubscriberHi Peter,
Thank you for your quick response - as usual-, an error occurred after the previous warning and the model couldn't show any results ( the error message is attached below, sorry for forgetting it in the previous attachment). I tried to run the same model using orthotropic stress limits to simulate the soil and its weakness in tension and the model has worked and there are some extracted mode shapes shows that the soil and the wall have separated. I can't understand why the modal analysis could solve the problem with the ortotropic stress limits ,but it couldn't solve with the mohr-coulomb matrial model? could you please explain it in more details?!
-
June 24, 2018 at 2:15 pm
peteroznewman
SubscriberYou can't solve a Modal analysis with Mohr-Coulomb because that is not supported by the material model.
The reason is probably because the material model can't represent unlimited tensile stresses. Since a Modal analysis has arbitrary deformation magnitudes, the maximum tensile stress can't be guaranteed to remain in the valid region, so ANSYS turned off the ability to use that material in any solution but the two shown above.
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Boost Ansys Fluent Simulations with AWS
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) helps engineers design products in which the flow of fluid components is a significant challenge. These different use cases often require large complex models to solve on a traditional workstation. Click here to join this event to learn how to leverage Ansys Fluids on the cloud, thanks to Ansys Gateway powered by AWS.

Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.

Ansys Blog
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- Solver Pivot Warning in Beam Element Model
- Saving & sharing of Working project files in .wbpz format
- Understanding Force Convergence Solution Output
- User manual
- An Unknown error occurred during solution. Check the Solver Output…..
- What is the difference between bonded contact region and fixed joint
- The solver engine was unable to converge on a solution for the nonlinear problem as constrained.
- whether have the difference between using contact and target bodies
- Defining rigid body and contact
- Colors and Mesh Display
-
7552
-
4424
-
2949
-
1414
-
1322
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.