March 29, 2022 at 2:04 pmalbin.linderstamSubscriber
I'm doing a fatigue analysis, not the Fatigue Tool in Ansys, but a predefined fatigue method ("hand calculations") where we use stresses from the static analysis in Ansys as input. It is ductile materials (aluminium alloys and stainless steels). I'm wondering which stress that is the most correct to examine since it's not defined in the fatigue method.
I've read in other forums that Von Mises Stress be used for static analysis of ductile materials in general and that max principal stress can be used for brittle materials and for example only torque load. But regarding Fatigue Analysis it seems that the opinions differ, even though it seems that most recommend Max Principal Stress, for example:
http://fatiguetoolbox.org/fatlab/documentation/theory-reference "This is probably the most commonly used fatigue effective stress and is therefore used as default. It is not fool-proof for multiaxial loading though"
So the question is Which stress should be examined for a Fatigue Analysis? Von Mises, Max Principal Stress, other or the favorite one "it depends"?
Thank you for your support!March 29, 2022 at 9:23 pmRev0SubscriberHallo Sorry but the best answer is: It depends!
First of all you should decide for a proper method, guideline or code for your application. These define if you need to evaluate nominal, structural or local stress. This decision has the highest influence to your FEA because it could change a simple beam structure up to a solid structure with modeled welds and nonlinear bolt connections.
Some (european) examples why it depends:
Pressure vessels prefere stress intensity
Bolts are evaluate with nominal stress (tension, bending, shear)
Welds need stresses in longitudinal, parallel and shear
So if you want to identify high stressed regions you might use von Mises or on the more conservative side the stress intensity. But if this applies to your "predefined fatigue method" I can't tell.
And please never forget to use the correct stress amplitude or range for fatigue!
Viewing 1 reply thread
Ansys Innovation Space
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Boost Ansys Fluent Simulations with AWS
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) helps engineers design products in which the flow of fluid components is a significant challenge. These different use cases often require large complex models to solve on a traditional workstation. Click here to join this event to learn how to leverage Ansys Fluids on the cloud, thanks to Ansys Gateway powered by AWS.
Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.Trending discussions
- Solver Pivot Warning in Beam Element Model
- Saving & sharing of Working project files in .wbpz format
- Understanding Force Convergence Solution Output
- User manual
- An Unknown error occurred during solution. Check the Solver Output…..
- What is the difference between bonded contact region and fixed joint
- The solver engine was unable to converge on a solution for the nonlinear problem as constrained.
- whether have the difference between using contact and target bodies
- Defining rigid body and contact
- Colors and Mesh Display
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.Ansys does not support the usage of unauthorized Ansys software. Please visit www.ansys.com to obtain an official distribution.