August 2, 2019 at 8:50 amsimone01Subscriber
I am using fluent meshing to make the mesh, I found myself very well using Watertight geoometry for the previous geometries, unfortunately I can't use it for the current geometry (I have to simulate the rotation of the impellers in a mixing tank, I'm using the MRF approach so I don't have a clean geometry) I am therefore using the Fault tolerant meshing.
Using watertight geometry on the surfaces of my geometry the polyhedra elements are applied by default, with Fault tolerant meshing the tetrahedra elements instead. Is it possible to mesh the surface with polyhedra elements with Fault Tolerant Meshing?
August 2, 2019 at 2:03 pmRobAnsys Employee
Fluent Meshing always uses tri mesh when doing the initial surface meshing. When you mesh the volume it remeshes using poly cells. If you have tri cells at the end of the fault tolerant workflow you may have missed a setting.
No reason why you can't use watertight with impellers with mrf zones. You just need to be careful with the zone definitions. If you want sliding mesh, you could build two models. Look up "append mesh" in Fluent.
August 2, 2019 at 3:27 pmsimone01SubscriberThanks for the reply.
Then I'll try again using watertight. The problem is that in update boundaries I detected the rotating zone of the impeller and the void of the impeller, but it did not detect all the volume outside the rotating zone. So would you suggest me to do two separate models (for the rotating zone and for the rest of the tank volume) and import them into fluent meshing for the MRF approach? Thank you
August 2, 2019 at 3:39 pmRobAnsys Employee
It should pick up both fluid and the single void zones. If that doesn't work you can try two meshes but not they'll not be conformal in Fluent (read up on mesh interface zones).
September 3, 2019 at 11:14 pmclmr90Subscriber
The same happened to me although with a case of wheel rotation (the zone inside was detected but not the rest of the control volume). Sadly no solution yet, Hopefully you will find a solution too.
September 4, 2019 at 1:32 pmRobAnsys Employee
Have you labelled the surface between the two volumes? Did you label the volumes in SpaceClaim?
September 4, 2019 at 7:26 pm
September 5, 2019 at 9:47 amRobAnsys Employee
Did you use ShareTopology?
September 6, 2019 at 3:26 pm
September 29, 2020 at 3:11 amjohan_betancourSubscriberHello, did you get a solution to this problem?nI need to simulate the rotation of a turbine and I'm trying to use advantages of the watertight workflow, but fluent's manual says I can't make a non conformal mesh with that workflow. Could I get a non conformal mesh with the Fault tolerant workflow?nThanks for your help.n
September 30, 2020 at 10:43 amRobAnsys EmployeeNo, but if you check the other thread there are options. https://forum.ansys.com/discussion/comment/92617#Comment_92617n
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- ANSYS Workbench Measuring within Design
- how to improve the inflation quality at sharp corners?
- check element type
- The mesh file exporter could not resolve cyclic dependencies in overlapping contact regions error
- How to resolve Mesh Failure
- Meshing Error
- Error in meshing
- Conformal vs Non-Conformal Mesh
- execution error inside the mesher. The process suffered an unhandled exception or ran out of memory
- inflation created stairstep mesh at some location
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.