June 1, 2020 at 11:03 amtuffahaSubscriber
Following parts are available:
- Bearing blocks, representing the housing
However, the bearings are missing.
Following Elements were applied:
- Fixed constraint on the bottom of the two bearing blocks
- Remote displacement on the other end of the shaft ( x rotation and displacement ramped)
- Force on the end of the shaft
- A group of four spring elements on each bearing block should add a stiffness, representing the bearing stiffness.
The shaft will be bent upwards in the positive Y-direction. I didnt get what I was looking for in the results. I wanted to see a force acting on the bearing blocks as well, but there was no deformation nor stress on them. Why?
The setup and results are seen below
June 2, 2020 at 11:01 ampeteroznewmanSubscriber
Were the springs of the type Body-Ground? That would explain why there is no stress in the bearing blocks.
I recommend you take two planes at +/- 45 degrees and split the cylindrical face of each bearing block into four pieces. Also take two more planes parallel to YZ through the center of each bearing block to split the face of the shaft. Create a Remote Point on each circular edge on the shaft. Then you can scope each outer end of each spring to a 1/4 face of the bearing block in a Body-Body spring configuration where the other end of the spring is connected to the respective Remote Point.
June 2, 2020 at 1:11 pmtuffahaSubscriber
Thank you for your reply Peter, your posts have been a great help to everyone here.
The faces of the shafts were already split. The springs are attached to the other body (Body - Body). The definition of the spring as seen in the picture:
Following messages appear as well:
I have also tried your approach by dividing the housing blocks, but it didnt work out, and the results came out the same.
More info: Scope radius = 30, shaft radius = 9.
Any other suggestions? Is there a way to upload the file so that you can take a look at it?
Thank you Peter
June 3, 2020 at 11:02 ampeteroznewmanSubscriber
Analyzing stress in the bearing block using 4 springs is too simplified. You need a bearing outer race in frictional contact with the bearing block to get reasonable stress values in the bearing block.
June 3, 2020 at 11:39 amtuffahaSubscriber
so youre suggesting the following?
- Adding a solid body which represents a bearing outer race (cylinder fo example)
- Bearing outer raceshould be in a "frictional contact" with bearing block.
- Attaching the springs from shaft face to bearing outer race inner face.
June 3, 2020 at 12:25 pmtuffahaSubscriber
I tried this approach. Unfortunately it did not work.
I am happy to hear other suggestions.
Here is also a download link to the file, in case there is a mistake that I did and that I did not know of:
June 3, 2020 at 4:20 pmtuffahaSubscriber
I have tried a new approach now. I reduced all the parts to small cylinders ( shaft, bearing inner race, bearing outer race, Housing). Spring were defined body - body between inner race and outer race. contacts were frictional for shaft - inner race and housing - outer race.
The 4 springs were defined on faces and on edges. I got different results:
Stress (Von Mises):
I am kind of confused what to use and what not to use.
How would you model a bearing that is not there, and the only information you have abt it is its stiffness? Maybe there is an alternative.
June 3, 2020 at 4:26 pmpeteroznewmanSubscriber
Springs can push down on a bearing block, but they also pull up, which is wrong.
Frictional contact can only push, it never pulls because it separates instead.
I haven't had time to look at your model to see what is wrong, but I stand by my recommendation.
June 3, 2020 at 4:32 pmtuffahaSubscriber
No problem. Take your time to take a look at it.
Yes the pulling makes this unrealistic. Your recommendation was to add a bearing outer race. This was added. But adding the outer race didnt change the results so much and it wont solve the pulling problem which is caused by the springs rights?
June 10, 2020 at 5:36 pmtuffahaSubscriber
sorry to disturb again. did you find a solution?
June 11, 2020 at 2:40 ampeteroznewmanSubscriber
Some members here have the balls (or cylinders) between the inner race and the outer race. When you do that, there are no springs to pull up. It is all contact. The down side of this approach is the very long computation time.
June 11, 2020 at 9:55 amtuffahaSubscriber
Well, that is exactly why I did this post. I want an FEM analysis that includes the stiffness of the bearing, without having the bearing itself. A simplified bearing you can say.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Boost Ansys Fluent Simulations with AWS
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) helps engineers design products in which the flow of fluid components is a significant challenge. These different use cases often require large complex models to solve on a traditional workstation. Click here to join this event to learn how to leverage Ansys Fluids on the cloud, thanks to Ansys Gateway powered by AWS.
Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- Saving & sharing of Working project files in .wbpz format
- Solver Pivot Warning in Beam Element Model
- Understanding Force Convergence Solution Output
- An Unknown error occurred during solution. Check the Solver Output…..
- What is the difference between bonded contact region and fixed joint
- whether have the difference between using contact and target bodies
- The solver engine was unable to converge on a solution for the nonlinear problem as constrained.
- Colors and Mesh Display
- User manual
- material damping and modal analysis
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.