July 31, 2023 at 4:13 pmBrendan De LeonSubscriber
Hello! I am a little new to the Fluent program, and as such, I would like a confirmation on some results I have acquired, which I cannot seem to find anywhere else. I am modeling a pipe with an overall length of approximately 5.2 meters and an ID of 0.5 Inches. I have given it an inlet pressure of 30 PSI, an outlet gauge Pressure of 0, and an inlet velocity of.05 m/s, set the fluid to water and turned on energy. I used the laminar flow equation.
Consistently, I get 0 gauge pressure at the outlet. This seems to make sense to me, as there would be a significant head loss- but some other members of my team seem doubtful. Is this a reasonable result? I have posted the pressure contour below. Any information or advice you could offer would be appreciated, thank you!
July 31, 2023 at 8:21 pmFederico Alzamora PrevitaliSubscriber
The solution you get is bounded by the boundary conditions that you define. If your outlet BC is set to 0psi gauge pressure, the solver will aim towards that value for its solution. Hence, by definition you should get 0psi for a converged solution.
What is curious to me is that you define both the inlet velocity and pressure at the inlet. The Supersonic/Initial Gauge Pressure for velocity inlets is typically used for supersonic inlets, which is not the case for you. You should leave it at 0psi.
August 1, 2023 at 5:31 amNickFLSubscriber
For the boundary conditions, what do you know? The outlet pressure set to zero relative pressure is good. Do you know the inlet mass flow rate? How did you choose the velocity value of 0.05 [m/s]? Keep in mind if you put a uniform inlet velocity in there will be a larger pressure drop as the flow tends to the parabolic shape. If there is a long section upstream, maybe defining this inlet velocity parabola using Named Expressions.
But all that is for later. Before we sit down in front of the computer we need to do hand calculations to get a good estimate so we can accurately model the problem. (Plus we need to show all that time in the Universtiy was not wasted 🙂 ) Use what you learned in your Fluid Dyanmics class to calculate the Reynolds Number (validate the flow is laminar), compute the pressure drop (remember old Moody’s diagram?), plus all the correlations for the bends. Then you have a “good” estimate of what your pressure drop will be. This will give you, in this case, a very good data point that you can use to validate your CFD model.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Boost Ansys Fluent Simulations with AWS
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) helps engineers design products in which the flow of fluid components is a significant challenge. These different use cases often require large complex models to solve on a traditional workstation. Click here to join this event to learn how to leverage Ansys Fluids on the cloud, thanks to Ansys Gateway powered by AWS.
Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- Floating point exception in Fluent
- What are the differences between CFX and Fluent?
- Heat transfer coefficient
- Difference between K-epsilon and K-omega Turbulence Model
- Getting graph and tabular data from result in workbench mechanical
- The solver failed with a non-zero exit code of : 2
- Suppress Fluent to open with GUI while performing in journal file
- Mesh Interfaces in ANSYS FLUENT
- Time Step Size and Courant Number
- error: Received signal SIGSEGV
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.