October 19, 2018 at 10:01 amAmirSubscriber
I am working on population balance model to see how particle distribution changes through a continuous reactor.
At this stage the only phenomena occurring in the reactor is particle growth rate which in fact has absolutely no effect on the number of particles. So the same number of particles has to be obtained at inlet and outlet. However, it is not the case with fluent.
First I saw this problem was when I tried to increase the residence time and realized that the number of particles at outlet decreases with increasing residence time.
So I thought it is because of my class definition and the number of classes is not enough to cover all possible particle in the reactor. I increased thus the number of classes testing 30, 35 and 40 classes and obtained always around 16% lost in particles.
Below you can find the results on number of particles vs. number of classes at steady state for same condition (growth rate value, particle volume fraction and inlet velocity are all the same in these cases):
I am using fluent 19.2 Population balance discrete method with mixture multiphase method.
Could you please help me out with this issue?
Any suggestions and comment is greatly appreciated.
October 19, 2018 at 11:09 amDrAmineAnsys Employee
What about the volume fraction of the secondary phase: Is it conserved?
It is better for debugging if you use the Population Balance Post Processing function to list all Number Density for all bin's at outlet and at inlet.
October 19, 2018 at 12:03 pmDrAmineAnsys Employee
Another question: The particle growth in your case is due to which mechanism?
October 20, 2018 at 4:20 pmAmirSubscriber
Thanks for your reply.
Actually the solid volume fraction is slightly decreased due to the lost that we have in number of particles.
I put just the sum of all bins here to make it easier to look otherwise I list always the number of particles for all bins at inlet and at outlet.
For your second question, it is a constant growth rate which occurs in the reactor. I would like it to be as simple as possible and did not consider any growth mechanism either by mass transfer or by reaction.
October 22, 2018 at 5:53 amDrAmineAnsys Employee
That means your growth is not due to expansion and not to mass transfer and not reactions. This is not really physical and needs to be corrected. At least the primary phase needs to be reduced here to get into account that the mass has changed the phase.
You said the volume fraction is lost a bit: can you then check if the new volume fraction with the averaged mean Sauter diameter do fit the number densities on inlet /outlet
October 22, 2018 at 3:22 pmAmirSubscriber
You are right and it is due to the fact that I did not consider any mechanisms with which particles could growth.
I run a simple test activating PBM mass transfer and the number of particles became the same at inlet and outlet.
October 22, 2018 at 4:59 pmDrAmineAnsys Employee
Amir you are welcome.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- Suppress Fluent to open with GUI while performing in journal file
- Floating point exception in Fluent
- What are the differences between CFX and Fluent?
- Heat transfer coefficient
- Getting graph and tabular data from result in workbench mechanical
- The solver failed with a non-zero exit code of : 2
- Difference between K-epsilon and K-omega Turbulence Model
- Time Step Size and Courant Number
- Mesh Interfaces in ANSYS FLUENT
- error in cfd post
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.