March 18, 2022 at 1:55 amFluxLimitedSubscriber
I am running a transient, incompressible, turbulent (SST k-w), single-phase simulation with the pressure-based solver (coupled solver). I have several different length scales in the problem so I have widely varying mesh densities across the geometry in order to resolve the boundary layer and flow features everywhere. My timestep is dropping to 1e-8 s using the Adaptive Method even with Courant number up to 20. This is unreasonably low. Am I just out of luck with this simulation at my current mesh density?
One thing I note is that for the steady-state solve the residuals take quite a while to drop but when moving to transient solve they drop quickly and converge quickly (albeit with dt = 1e-8). What can this be indicative of?March 18, 2022 at 8:06 amaitor.amatriainSubscriberThe required time step size is proportional to the mesh size, so what you see is normal.
March 18, 2022 at 9:44 amDrAmineAnsys EmployeeTransient consists of N steps of recurring steady state cycles: for that reason residuals will drop towards the end of time step and increase again at the beginning of the next time step where we start from the previous solution (as if you start every time a new "steady state" run with data coming from previous time stamp).
March 18, 2022 at 1:45 pmFluxLimitedSubscriberI understand that, of course. My comment on the residuals is that when running the steady state solve it takes many hundreds of iterations for the continuity residual to drop down to around 1e-2 and they basically stay hovering around there. But if I stop the steady state solve and turn on transient the continuity residual immediately plummets down to 1e-6 in a handful of iterations. In transient I can get the residuals almost arbitrarily low without any problem.
March 18, 2022 at 2:15 pmaitor.amatriainSubscriberThe residual of the steady state solver is the residual of the steady state solution, while the residual of the transient solver is the residual of the transient solution. These are different solutions qith different physics involved.
Try to put a time step of 1e-16. Even the most complex problem with a poor mesh converges because essentially nothing happens between the iterations.
In single-phase flows with RANS yo should get a converged solution with the Coupled solver in less than 500 time steps. If not, you should improve your mesh before simulating the transient problem.
March 18, 2022 at 2:33 pmRobAnsys EmployeeYes, however in the transient solver you need to let it run long enough that the results are changing with the flow field rather than still adjusting from the initial condition. At 1e-6s how may time steps would it take the flow to get from the domain inlet to outlet?
Viewing 5 reply threads
Ansys Innovation Space
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.Trending discussions
- Suppress Fluent to open with GUI while performing in journal file
- Floating point exception in Fluent
- What are the differences between CFX and Fluent?
- Heat transfer coefficient
- Getting graph and tabular data from result in workbench mechanical
- The solver failed with a non-zero exit code of : 2
- Difference between K-epsilon and K-omega Turbulence Model
- Time Step Size and Courant Number
- Mesh Interfaces in ANSYS FLUENT
- error in cfd post
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.Ansys does not support the usage of unauthorized Ansys software. Please visit www.ansys.com to obtain an official distribution.