-
-
April 30, 2023 at 9:57 pm
Patrick Kozlowski
SubscriberProblem with drag and lift outputs for analysis of FSAE car in a corner. Domain setup:
Inlet on left side, zero-gauge pressure outlet on right. The fluid region is created using an enclosure around the car (connected to ground), and this fluid region is rotating at 1.25 rad/s, about 20 m/s at the cars location. The ground is moving at the same speed from the same axis origin. The car and ground are no-slip walls, while the enclsure walls are free shear.
When creating report files for drag and lift, are there any considerations for referance frames in terms of calculating forces that need to be changed? Or does using an enclosure as the moving fluid region not work for this setup?
For the straigt-line simulation, the car showed around 500 N of downforce. In the curved domain, we get an output of only 13 N. Below are some example output plots of the corner domain simulations. The mesh has no problems.
-
May 5, 2023 at 9:24 am
Sunil Lilhare
Ansys EmployeeFor this simulation I think no special consideration for force calculation is required just be sure about the values of x, y and z force vectors for force calculation. For more accuracy the fluid zone should be rotated by using frame motion in the Cell Zone Conditions of the solver if not done already. To know more on different options available for setting frame motion to cell zones, please refer to the link of Ansys Fluent User Guide given below
7.2. Cell Zone Conditions (ansys.com)
Velocity contour would help in resolving the issue.-
May 5, 2023 at 2:42 pm
Patrick Kozlowski
SubscriberThank you for the reply.
The flow was set using the frame motion, and the force outputs are in the correct directions. Below are additional outputs including velocity contour. The pathlines show less interaction than expected, and forces are too low.
The second approach was to use a stationary frame and rotate the flow around the domain. This resulted in better forces, although the flow was only ideal around the car. The pathlines and contours sohw turbulence not seen with the frame motion.
Based on the results and the fact that only the fluid zone was changed from moving to stationary, I think the problem stems from the enclosure + moving frame pairing. The car seems to be present when flow first makes contact in moving frame, but then pathlines look like they stop, and force values are far too low.
-
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Boost Ansys Fluent Simulations with AWS
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) helps engineers design products in which the flow of fluid components is a significant challenge. These different use cases often require large complex models to solve on a traditional workstation. Click here to join this event to learn how to leverage Ansys Fluids on the cloud, thanks to Ansys Gateway powered by AWS.

Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.

Ansys Blog
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- Suppress Fluent to open with GUI while performing in journal file
- Floating point exception in Fluent
- What are the differences between CFX and Fluent?
- Heat transfer coefficient
- Getting graph and tabular data from result in workbench mechanical
- Difference between K-epsilon and K-omega Turbulence Model
- The solver failed with a non-zero exit code of : 2
- Time Step Size and Courant Number
- Mesh Interfaces in ANSYS FLUENT
- error: Received signal SIGSEGV
-
5290
-
3311
-
2471
-
1308
-
1016
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.