March 16, 2020 at 8:54 pmNathanEmerySubscriberHi I am currently investigating noise simulation using Harmonic Analysis. I have multiple mechanical components enclosed in an acoustic domain generated by an enclosure in space claim following the tuning fork acoustics tutorial video on YouTube. In the tuning fork acoustics video, Peter mentions he would slice up the geometry to get more accurate meshing but I am not sure how to do this. My mesh is not generating for my acoustic domain for any settings, pre defined or ANSYS default. I think this is an issue of fine mesh at contact regions of the mechanical structures and the acoustic domain. What meshing techniques I.e. inflation or contact mesh sizing should I use in order to generate the acoustic domain mesh. Please let me know, I can also include pictures of files if needed
March 17, 2020 at 2:17 pm
March 17, 2020 at 7:37 pmNathanEmerySubscriber
Thank you for the reference video, this is very good for various meshing techniques, however I am still facing issues with the enclosure feature to create an acoustic domain.
When the FE acoustic enclosure structure surrounds another FE mechanical structure my mesh is failing. Is there any options in ANSYS that allows for an enclosure to match the surface meshing of the components it is surrounding. Please advise.
March 18, 2020 at 2:09 am
March 19, 2020 at 8:21 pmNathanEmerySubscriber
For example here are two different failed meshes. The first image is when I allowed ANSYS to generate default mesh and the second image is when I tried to define contact sizing between the mechanical components and the acoustic domain. The acoustic domain is a sphere and these pictures are from a sectional view.
As can be seen in the pictures the areas of the mechanical components that meet the acoustic domain have very fine mesh. Is there any option in ANSYS to for the enclosure to match all boundary conditions mesh?
March 19, 2020 at 8:52 pmpeteroznewmanSubscriber
I recommend you take three orthogonal planes at the center of your air sphere and slice the sphere and mechanical parts using those three planes into smaller pieces. Use Shared Topology to put the pieces of air back into one part and put the mechanical parts back into another part or parts as the case may be. I think that will help the mesher to fill those volumes.
March 23, 2020 at 6:45 pmNathanEmerySubscriber
Thank you for the recommendation, I used the three orthogonal planes to split and share all the geometry, both acoustic and mechanical components, but the meshing still failed.
I believe the problem may be the very small air gap areas surrounding one of the mechanical components, this is reflected by the picture in green. I have tried contact size meshing for these small areas in contact and I've also tried some inflation for the areas of concern but neither worked.
I've attached some pictures to described my issues. Please let me know if you see any problems or if I should try another method to generate the mesh.
March 24, 2020 at 4:08 amKeyur KanadeAnsys Employee
i suggest you to take only quarter of the domain for debug purpose.
try to mesh only quarter. if meshing fails, right click on error message and select show problematic geometry. please observe the location carefully and make modifications at geometry or meshing controls.
once you could mesh quarter of geometry, you can apply similar strategy to entire domain.
If this helps, please mark this post as 'Is Solution' to help others.
March 25, 2020 at 5:35 pmpeteroznewmanSubscriber
Nathan, I agree with Keyur that you should initially work on a small piece of this.
I expect you are correct about the source of the problem. I expect those thin "petals" an important part of the model.
I can see that the sphere has not been sliced by the third plane.
In any case, if you want to share your model, you can right click on the Mesh and Clear Generated Data, then File > Save, then File > Archive and then you can attach the .wbpz file after you post a reply as long as the file size is < 120 MB. Say what version of ANSYS you are using in your reply.
April 20, 2020 at 12:57 amNathanEmerySubscriber
Thank you both Keyur and Peter for your suggestions, I edited the mesh appropriately and figured out the meshing issues with the small air gaps.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Simulation World 2022
Check out more than 70 different sessions now available on demand. Get inspired as you hear from visionary companies, leading researchers and educators from around the globe on a variety of topics from life-saving improvements in healthcare, to bold new realities of space travel. Take a leap of certainty and check out a session today here.
Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- ANSYS Workbench Measuring within Design
- How to resolve Mesh Failure
- The mesh file exporter could not resolve cyclic dependencies in overlapping contact regions error
- check element type
- Meshing Error
- Error in meshing
- Conformal vs Non-Conformal Mesh
- Ansys 19.0 – will not create mesh
- Dealing with inflation layers around sharp corners in Ansys workbench meshing
- inflation created stairstep mesh at some location
© 2022 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.