Electronics

Electronics

Help In-accurate Simulation Results

    • Taiye Owu
      Subscriber

      Please I need help on my simulation. I have a coil structure in my lab constructed for wireless power transfer, I am currently carrying out a simulation of that same coil structure using the same parameters, such as number of turns and dimensions. Now the problem is that the self and mutual inductance from my simulation results is far from my measured result in the actual system. The measured self inductance is 90uH, but my simulated result gives me 50uH. I initially was using magnetostatics solution type and thought that was the reason for the inaccuracy, but even when I changed my solution type to eddy current, it gives me only a bit higher result of 55uH. I also changed the initial mesh to be very fine, but still same results. Am I missing out on something or are there some other settings I need to do? I have attached relevant images for the top view, the isometric view and with region. My setup uses simulation error of 0.5% with 30 passes max and solves after convergence. I just need to know why my inductances are much smaller than the original system, cause I expect a bit of deviation, but not as much as I see. Thank you.

       

    • Navya C
      Ansys Employee

      Hi Taiye,

      It looks like the region size is less along the  Z direction. can you increase the region size in all directions equally and see if the inductance result improves?

       

      Regards,

      Navya

       

    • Taiye Owu
      Subscriber

      Alright, I will do that and let you know thank you.

    • Taiye Owu
      Subscriber

      Hi, I adjusted the region size as you said, I had just slightly higher inductance now from 55uH to 59uH. But this is still far from the physical pad I'm simulating. Do I increase the region further to be very large?

    • Navya C
      Ansys Employee

       

      Hi Taiye,

      If your result is changing with the change in region size means region size is still not enough.

      I suggest you keep increasing region sizes in steps and observe the result. At some point, you will not see a change in results with an increase in region size, that is the minimum region size you need.

      Regards,

      Navya

       

    • Taiye Owu
      Subscriber

      Okay, I will do that and feed you back. Thank you

    • Taiye Owu
      Subscriber

      Hello Navya, I have maxed out the region size and my inductance remains at 59uH. Is there something else I can do?

    • Navya C
      Ansys Employee

      Hi Taiye,

      Another thing that needs to be changed is instead of giving the current as in and out from the boundary, please change it to a closed loop with a lesser length of lead wires, make a section and assign current excitation to that section. 

      Also, have you ensured both the test frequency and the frequency of excitation in the simulation are the same?

      Regards,

      Navya

    • Taiye Owu
      Subscriber

      Hello Navya,

      How do I set the frequency of excitation? I can't see anywhere to do that.

    • Navya C
      Ansys Employee

      For eddy current simulation, its under Add soultion setup>solver tab

    • Taiye Owu
      Subscriber

      Yes I have this set up to 85Khz. And I have given the excitation in a closed loop, using section. I still have about 59uH.

      • Deyu Li
        Ansys Employee

        Hi Taiye, what is the value you got in the real test? Could you also try simulating 0.1Hz and comparing with DC test result?

    • Taiye Owu
      Subscriber

      The real test is 90uH. Okay, I will try simulate with 0.1Hz and get back to you.

Viewing 11 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.