-
-
June 13, 2023 at 2:43 pm
sonny cain
SubscriberHi all,
I'm trying to run a simulation for an aerfoil with increasig surface roughness on the leading edge. However, to save myself the time of manually chaning the surface roughness per simulation I have set up a parameter set which you can see in the image. The issue is, that the values I get from running the parameter set are incorrect and far different to the values I get from running the simulation with a different manually changed surface roughness, any ideas?
The lift should decrease and drag increase as surface roughness is increased, however this is clearly not the case for my parameter set.
-
June 14, 2023 at 1:27 pm
Hemantg_17
SubscriberHello,
If you manually alter the roughness and obtain different results, and if the parametric method delivers different results from the manual approach then please make sure if your parameters are defined correctly. If you can, share the screenshots of how you set up the input and output parameters.Please follow this links to get more information : Working with Parameters and Design Points (ansys.com) and Performing Parametric Studies (ansys.com)
If you are not able to access the link, refer to this forum discussion: How to access the ANSYS Online Help
-
June 14, 2023 at 1:33 pm
sonny cain
SubscriberHi,
I am wanting to increase surface roughness from 0.0001m to 0.001m and analyse the lift and drag coefficient for each Surface Roughness. I set up a Boundary Condition on the edge which the surface roughness must change, right clicked and set this as an input parameter then chose Lift and Drag as my output parameters.
If I leave it to run, the first parameter provides a correct value, but then it gives the same lift and drag value for each surface roughness after that which is incorrect.
My thoughts are because the lift and drag is from a plot which must converge, the plot isnt being reset between changing the surface roughness which is causing the same lift and drag coefficient.
-
June 14, 2023 at 2:10 pm
Federico Alzamora Previtali
SubscriberTry disabling the convergence check, run each condition with a set number of iterations, and see if your drag and lift change.
-
-
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Boost Ansys Fluent Simulations with AWS
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) helps engineers design products in which the flow of fluid components is a significant challenge. These different use cases often require large complex models to solve on a traditional workstation. Click here to join this event to learn how to leverage Ansys Fluids on the cloud, thanks to Ansys Gateway powered by AWS.

Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.

Ansys Blog
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- Floating point exception in Fluent
- What are the differences between CFX and Fluent?
- Heat transfer coefficient
- Difference between K-epsilon and K-omega Turbulence Model
- Getting graph and tabular data from result in workbench mechanical
- The solver failed with a non-zero exit code of : 2
- Suppress Fluent to open with GUI while performing in journal file
- Mesh Interfaces in ANSYS FLUENT
- Time Step Size and Courant Number
- error: Received signal SIGSEGV
-
7690
-
4484
-
2957
-
1435
-
1322
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.