December 9, 2019 at 5:00 ammaxtran196Subscriber
So I'm simulating a contact problem with a rigid cylinder and a foundation base. Both materials have different Young's Modulus and Poisson Ratio. The contact between the two bodies is frictionless.
The uniform distributed load is applied at the bottom of the foundation. The result I'm interested in is the force and the displacement at the top of the foundation.
As you can see, the results from both are quite different. I already know that the equation to compute the force from the displacement is correct. So there must be something wrong with my model.
Also when I try to change from PLANE 183 to PLANE 182, the results hardly change. And I'm having difficulty trying to refine the mesh.
I'm honestly at lost and I don't know how to check if I did anything wrong. I attached the zip file to my model. Any help would be very great. Thank you.
December 10, 2019 at 3:33 ampeteroznewmanSubscriber
Here are your loads and supports.
(1) Displacement [A] is redundant because the whole of the punch body has Fixed Support [D].
(2) Displacement 2 has X = 0, which is redundant because this edge is on the axis of an axisymmetric model so it already can't move in the X direction.
Delete both displacements and the problem will solve the same without them.
A better mesh control method to capture the Hertz stress pattern at the edge of the punch is a set of three Body Sizing mesh controls using Sphere of Influence (which needs a Csys at the corner). There is a small radius with small elements, a medium radius with medium element size and a large radius with large elements then the global mesh size is huge.
You plot reaction force of the punch vs the displacement of the bottom of the foundation and compare that to an analytical force. The analytical force seems to be about 1/4 of the force in your model. I don't know where you got this analytical force from, but if you want your model to put out force results closer to the analytical values, just make the foundation 4 times deeper (longer in the Y direction). You will then get to the same displacement as before with 1/4 of the force. Of course if the analytical force has an input for foundation depth, that may defeat the purpose of making a model with a deeper foundation.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Boost Ansys Fluent Simulations with AWS
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) helps engineers design products in which the flow of fluid components is a significant challenge. These different use cases often require large complex models to solve on a traditional workstation. Click here to join this event to learn how to leverage Ansys Fluids on the cloud, thanks to Ansys Gateway powered by AWS.
Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- Solver Pivot Warning in Beam Element Model
- Saving & sharing of Working project files in .wbpz format
- Understanding Force Convergence Solution Output
- An Unknown error occurred during solution. Check the Solver Output…..
- What is the difference between bonded contact region and fixed joint
- User manual
- The solver engine was unable to converge on a solution for the nonlinear problem as constrained.
- whether have the difference between using contact and target bodies
- material damping and modal analysis
- Colors and Mesh Display
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.