August 7, 2019 at 9:22 pmAlisafianSubscriber
I want to simulate a cylindrical roller with a diameter of 20 mm and a height of 30 mm. It is located on a thick plate, and a vertical force of 4000N is being applied on a line on the top of the cylinder. According to Hertzian contact theory, a contact pressure of 682 MPa will be created.
I would like to ask, if I delete this cylinder from my 3D model, and instead, I use vertical load on the plate directly or using nodal force on the plate directly, how can I make my simulation result closer to the real situation where I apply the force on the deformable cylinder. My results are too different.
I know that applying force on the cylinder will create a very narrow surface to surface contact and it is not equal to nodal or line force anymore. The thing I am looking for is an equivalent force which mimics the behavior of cylinder (surface to surface contact)
Is there any method to solve this problem?
August 8, 2019 at 8:05 amjj77Subscriber
That is not working (nodal forces - since you do not know the distribution which depends on the contact).
Use contact between parts when doing this type of analysis.
See the verification manual to see how this is set up and understand it:
VM63 or VM191 or VM272 it is called:
August 8, 2019 at 3:05 pmAlisafianSubscriber
I appreciate your response. I have already watched this video, and that is why this insight showed up in my mind to use equivalent nodal force instead of the sphere/cylinder. Because for an accurate result, we need small mesh size and inflation around the edges. This feature highly increases the computational time if the model is explicit dynamic and the roller is passing over this surface.
In this video, the surface is rigid and is considered as one element. Suppose we need to consider deformable surface as well. If the surface also needs small mesh size and inflation, the computational time will be increased. Am I right?
August 8, 2019 at 3:14 pmjj77Subscriber
A Hertzian contact problem is a a nonlinear contact model so we need to model the contact in detail in order to capture the pressure distribution . So this is not simple and can ofcourse not be represented by nodal forces.
Now if you have a truck driving over a bridge so you want to see the global response (deflection due to moving load) and do not care about the local pressure distribution on the deck, then yes we can just use an equivalent force for the truck that moves over the structure.
So if we care about the local stresses under the contact, then that needs to be modelled in detail with contacts. If we do not care and we care about a global response like for the bridge than a point force is fine.
August 8, 2019 at 3:16 pmAlisafianSubscriber
Thank you very much for your response.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- Saving & sharing of Working project files in .wbpz format
- An Unknown error occurred during solution. Check the Solver Output…..
- Understanding Force Convergence Solution Output
- Solver Pivot Warning in Beam Element Model
- Colors and Mesh Display
- How to calculate the residual stress on a coating by Vickers indentation?
- whether have the difference between using contact and target bodies
- What is the difference between bonded contact region and fixed joint
- The solver engine was unable to converge on a solution for the nonlinear problem as constrained.
- User manual
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.