September 6, 2021 at 4:34 amumadSubscriber
I am modelling masonry wall in LS DYNA. Airbags (inflate and deflect) were used to apply the displacement out-of-plane loading on the wall in a semi-cyclic manner. I have recently been trying to replicate the experiment setup using the LS DYNA, as shown in the image; however, I am having difficulty applying the loading protocol. I do not know which LS DYNA keyword to use for the application of the out-of-plane loading protocol. The airbags, when inflated, provide a spatially uniformly distributed loading on the wall. I know that the loading protocol can be applied using the BOUNDARY_PRESCRIBED_MOTION keyword for the In-plane loading simulation. I would be glad to know the LS DYNA keywords or methods to apply the loading successfully?September 6, 2021 at 10:31 amSeptember 6, 2021 at 1:19 pmumadSubscriberDear Aniket Thanks for the information and the links.
Here is the image of the experiment(cavity wall) and LS dyna simulation (of single wall) under monotonic loading (I used LOAD_SEGMENT_SET keyword to apply the lateral load). I want to know how I can apply cyclic loading (displacement) on the wall in the same manner.
September 22, 2021 at 9:10 pmAndreas KoutrasAnsys Employeehave you used cohesive elements or tiebreak contact for modeling the horizontal mortar joints ? If not, I think you should do so. In that case, the closest way I can think of is to prescribe equal displacement at the nodes that are right above and right below the mid-height (assuming symmetry). BOUNDARY_PRESCRIBED_MOTION can be used to apply the displacement. You may also need to use a finer mesh through the wall thickness to better capture the out-of-plane behavior.
September 28, 2021 at 6:28 amumadSubscriberHello.
Thanks for the feedback.
I used Contact _ Automatic_Surface_Surface_Tiebreak to model the mortar joints.
I will do as you advised.
May 3, 2022 at 12:37 pmumadSubscriberHello everyone.
I am doing simulation of Rigid body analysis of masonry wall in LS DYNA and needs help on how to improve the numerical simulation.
Wall dimensions: Height of the wall is 4.1m, Length is 1.15m, thickness is 0.35m. During the experiment, the crack height from the base of the wall is 2.501 m.i.e height of bottom wall is 2.501 m and height of top wall is 1.599
Contact Automatic Surface to Surface was used in a between the two walls interface and between the floor and bottom wall interface. Friction coefficient of 0.7was used.
Contact Automatic Surface to Surface was used in a between the top wall and top support. Zero friction was used here.
Uniformly distributed load was assigned on the wall face.
Material model: Top support and Floor (MAT_001) and assigned to Young modulus Elasticity of 40000 MPa
Two block walls (MAT_020) and assigned to masonry Young modulus of 4758 MPa
Numerical resultis not matching with the hand calculation (Rigid body Analysis)
Viewing 5 reply threads
Ansys Innovation Space
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Boost Ansys Fluent Simulations with AWS
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) helps engineers design products in which the flow of fluid components is a significant challenge. These different use cases often require large complex models to solve on a traditional workstation. Click here to join this event to learn how to leverage Ansys Fluids on the cloud, thanks to Ansys Gateway powered by AWS.
Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.Trending discussions
- Explicit dynamics ERRORS
- turning simulation
- explicit dynamics
- getting zero maximum and minimum stress value in explicit analysis
- How to figure out impact force in Explicit Dynamic Analysis
- How do get Full values instead of just minimum and maximum ?
- Monte Carlo Simulation
- Running an explicit dynamics simulation on a composite plate
- Euler Domain Restricting Simulation
- Error inside ANSYS LS Dyna: “An error occurred inside the SOLVER module: general error.”
Top Rated Tags
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.Ansys does not support the usage of unauthorized Ansys software. Please visit www.ansys.com to obtain an official distribution.