

May 3, 2018 at 1:29 pmJosé MantovaniSubscriber
Hello Everyone!
So, I am doing some simulations on hydrodynamic cavitation in a Venturi type tube and would like to find a good mesh for this, within the constraints of the student package. I would like to have a notion of how to find the best values for cell size near the wall.
What would be best? Do an analytical calculation in the Venturi regions and apply for each zone or calculate for the most critical zone and define for all? (since if the boundary layer is resolved in the critical zone, the same value would also satisfy the Venturi input for example and other regions). In this case, I say analytical calculation, to get a sense of the velocity in the regions and apply it to the Y + formula with the flow conditions, using Y + calculators available on CFD sites.
Below a image of geometry.
Thanks a lot! Every help and idea are welcome.
Mantovani.

May 5, 2018 at 6:56 pmraul.raghavSubscriber
It largely depends on the turbulence model you are planning to use. I'd use the SST model focusing on the diverging section of the venturi. Ideally, you'd want the y+ to be less than 1 so that you can accurately predict the separation. But as you mention with the student package, you might have some trouble meeting that requirement depending on the flow velocity. I'll add more information to this post in a couple of days.

May 6, 2018 at 11:03 amRaef.KobeissiSubscriber
As Rahul mentioned, it depends on 2 factors:
1. Are you interested in the friction losses? (I would assume you are)
2. What Model are you using?
I found this miniarticle which could help:
https://www.computationalfluiddynamics.com.au/turbulencepart3selectionofwallfunctionsandytobestcapturetheturbulentboundarylayer/
Generally speaking:
using models with enhanced wall treatment, Y+ value should be on the order of 1
 using wall function models Y+ value should be >15 to 300
I recommend you to read the article I attached.

May 8, 2018 at 1:48 pmJosé MantovaniSubscriber
It's very well guys.
As Rahul and Raef said, I saw in a article about the effect of cavitation hydrodynamic simulation using ANSYS, the author has tested 3 models of turbulence (kepsilon, SST and Reynolds Stress) and the best result was the one that converged with the experimental situation (of course, using the same parameters and geometry) is the kepsilon model.
I stay interested in capture the bubbles collapse, that is, I want be a best way to capture the cavitation hydrodynamic phenomenon within the constraints of the student package.
I decided to ask this question here because the flow through this type of geometry has in each region a peculiar behavior, even more in the divergent region where such an effect occurs.
So, Now I'll read the article gived by Raef.
Thanks one more time!

 You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Simulation World 2022
Check out more than 70 different sessions now available on demand. Get inspired as you hear from visionary companies, leading researchers and educators from around the globe on a variety of topics from lifesaving improvements in healthcare, to bold new realities of space travel. Take a leap of certainty and check out a session today here.
Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.
Ansys Blog
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
 Suppress Fluent to open with GUI while performing in journal file
 Heat transfer coefficient
 What are the differences between CFX and Fluent?
 Floating point exception in Fluent
 The solver failed with a nonzero exit code of : 2
 Getting graph and tabular data from result in workbench mechanical
 Difference between Kepsilon and Komega Turbulence Model
 Time Step Size and Courant Number
 Mesh Interfaces in ANSYS FLUENT
 error in cfd post

2002

1730

949

732

397
© 2022 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.