July 10, 2018 at 4:55 pmUlviSubscriber
So I have a geometry as attahced picture1. I used sweep meshing option and refined mesh at around perimeter and thickness as resulted as in Picture2. But when i slice the geometry I see the picture 3
Any clue how I can get elements shared inside the thickness correctly? I have assigned 5 elements to upper and lower boundary and 6 elements to sides but inside the geometry does not mesh properly.
General model in Picture 4
July 10, 2018 at 8:43 pmpeteroznewmanSubscriber
You have to assign a Mesh Control Method = Sweep. That will result in a hex mesh on the inside as well as the outside.
July 10, 2018 at 9:14 pmUlviSubscriber
I have already tried it alongside some other tecniques but could not achieve it. Just uploaded the model to original post. Appreciate if you could give a glance
July 11, 2018 at 12:15 am
July 11, 2018 at 8:19 amUlviSubscriber
Why do you need to do that? I thought, some meshing tecniquesin WB would be sufficient to solve the problem?
I have attached .step file that I used to import SolidWorks model into Ansys
July 11, 2018 at 10:41 ampeteroznewmanSubscriber
Import of Parasolids into NX11 was a way to check for geometry defects.
I recommend you use some Tetrahedral elements on this model around the joint, and have hex elements on the tubes.
One job I had five years ago was to find a design that could support a large load at the end of a long beam. In the image on top, the beam was initially horizontal. This design could not support the large load. The material model includes plasticity and you can see in the zoomed in view that there are tet elements in the joint, and hex elements on the tubes.
Three slice operations, put the parts into a multibody part, and you have a successful mesh in no time.
Rather than chamfers, this geometry used blends to represent the welds between the tubes.
July 11, 2018 at 1:03 pmpeteroznewmanSubscriber
I read your STEP file into SpaceClaim. I combined all the bodies back into a single body. On the Repair tab, clicked the Inexact Edges tool.
It found six, but could only repair four. Two inexact edges remained. This may cause problems meshing.
Also, I can't remove this extra face.
Precise geometry is needed for easy meshing. Inexact edges are going to deliver poor quality meshes as I found in this trial below.
It might be worth building this geometry from scratch in SpaceClaim. I did a blend instead of a chamfer and used a sphere to slice out the joint. The parasolid file for that is attached in the zip file.
July 11, 2018 at 8:14 pmUlviSubscriber
Solution to the problem is to apply face mesh to cross section which is a easy solution for me.
Thanks for sharing your experience. My project is an academic research project and I have to bear to welding specification as per AWS. On the top of it, mesh convergence study becomes more representable with sweep mesh. I certainly agree that Spaceclaim can produce tight tolerances however there are some modelling features that I could not find in SC which is available in SolidWorks ( probably because of my lack of experience in SC). This is not one off model but around 50 models and much more complext than this configuration. So I prefer to stick to the software that I am competent with given that I have sort time frame. I actually gave up splitting body around weld toes which eliminated all problems
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Boost Ansys Fluent Simulations with AWS
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) helps engineers design products in which the flow of fluid components is a significant challenge. These different use cases often require large complex models to solve on a traditional workstation. Click here to join this event to learn how to leverage Ansys Fluids on the cloud, thanks to Ansys Gateway powered by AWS.
Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- check element type
- The mesh file exporter could not resolve cyclic dependencies in overlapping contact regions error
- execution error inside the mesher. The process suffered an unhandled exception or ran out of memory
- Conformal vs Non-Conformal Mesh
- inflation created stairstep mesh at some location
- Error in meshing
- Meshing Error
- How to resolve Mesh Failure
- How to get three elements across the wall thickness of a thin part
- Meaning of the symbol crossed out tick mark on a body in the tree outline indicate in Meshing
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.