-
-
May 20, 2022 at 3:16 am
yli9003
SubscriberHello,
How to set chi3 in the form of third-order tensor in the nonlinear simulation?
May 20, 2022 at 6:57 pmGuilin Sun
Ansys EmployeeCurrently the full tensor is not officially supported. But the diagonalized tensor should work :
Please try this if you have diagonal tensor Chi3.
If you want off-diagonal tensor, you will need to develop your own plugin dll, and it is little supported from our side: Flexible Material Plugin Framework
May 21, 2022 at 10:10 amyli9003
SubscriberThank you for your response. Third-order nonlinear susceptibility, as far as I know, are third-order tensors with 27 tensor elements. But why does FDTD default to a second-order tensor? For instance, to which tensor element does ¤çxx, ¤çyy and ¤çzz particularly refer?
Furthermore, the FDTD website's tutorial discusses utilizing the attribute function to set the refractive index tensor with non-diagonal elements. Is this function useful for determining the ¤ç3 tensor?
May 24, 2022 at 3:00 pmGuilin Sun
Ansys EmployeeYou are right that the general 3rd order tensor has 27 elements. Lumerical's plugin material model can model 3by3 so it is simplified to xx,yy,and zz, meaning only ExEx,EyEy and EzEz terms are included.
I do not know which tutorial you are referring. For anisotropy material, yes you can use Matrix Transformation attribute to set such materials. Basically it diagonizes the full matrix into diagonal matrix and transformation matrix. However, not all 3by3 matrix can be diagnozed, in particular for broadband. This attribute is only used for anisotropy materials, not for non-linear materials.
May 27, 2022 at 9:40 amWenheJia
SubscriberHello In the third-order nonlinear process, I believe three electric field components must be considered. If only ExEx, EyEy, and EzEz terms are included, for example, SHG rather than THG or FWM can be obtained. Furthermore, I'm confused as to why ¤ç2 and ¤ç3 are in the same form in FDTD.
May 27, 2022 at 3:29 pmGuilin Sun
Ansys EmployeeYes you are right. However the current plugin material model only support diagonal case.
I am not sure what do you mean "¤ç2 and ¤ç3 are in the same form in FDTD". They have different units and act differently with the fields. If you still have questions regarding this, please write a new post.
https://support.lumerical.com/hc/en-us/articles/360034394734-Advanced-and-custom-optical-material-models-in-FDTD-and-MODE
Viewing 5 reply threads- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Ansys Innovation SpaceBoost Ansys Fluent Simulations with AWS
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) helps engineers design products in which the flow of fluid components is a significant challenge. These different use cases often require large complex models to solve on a traditional workstation. Click here to join this event to learn how to leverage Ansys Fluids on the cloud, thanks to Ansys Gateway powered by AWS.
Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.
Ansys Blog
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
Trending discussions- “Import optical generation” or “delta generation rate”?
- Why am I getting “process exited without calling finalize”, and how do I fix it?
- Error: addfdtd is not a valid function or a variable name
- Error on Lumerical device
- Using a license file on a new license server
- Ansys Insight: Transmission results greater than one
- Ansys Insight: Diverging Simulations
- Ansys Insight: About override mesh in FDTD: its use and settings
- Is there a Lumerical script command to output the Simulation and Memory requirements?
- Ansys Insight: Convergence issues in CHARGE
Top Contributors-
3812
-
2607
-
1853
-
1244
-
600
Top Rated Tags© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.
Ansys does not support the usage of unauthorized Ansys software. Please visit www.ansys.com to obtain an official distribution.
-