-
-
February 8, 2022 at 5:10 pm
tungseng99
SubscriberHi guys, I am trying to study the airflow pattern and temperature distribution within a greenhouse. Solar ray tracing with DO model is applied. There are velocity inlet and pressure outlet. The sidewalls and top wall of the external flow field are set as symmetry walls.
I have a question about setting the wall boundary condition of the ground around the greenhouse. I understand that if I have modeled the solid volume, then I don't have to put the wall thickness. And when the wall thickness is specified, there will be a thickness that grows away from the wall into the fluid. So, I'm a little bit confused and lost in this case whether do I need to put a wall thickness for the ground? Or do I actually need to model the solid volume of the ground?
It would be much appreciated if anyone could help me out with this.
Thank you in advance :)
February 9, 2022 at 8:04 amDrAmine
Ansys EmployeeYou have actually two approaches: either you model the ground as solid so you resolve the thickness or you rely on modeling it through a couple of ways. One of them is just to provide thickness and to have sort of resistance normal to the wall.
February 9, 2022 at 8:45 amtungseng99
SubscriberHi DrAmine Thanks for your reply!
I have another question is that I have a concrete floor inside the greenhouse with 10 cm thickness, I want to study the surface temperature distribution on the floor as well. Can I apply shell conduction on the floor?
February 9, 2022 at 2:36 pmRob
Ansys EmployeeYou can. However, if you expect the thermal mass of the slab and soil to have an effect on the result you may want to include the slab as a solid and soil as a thin wall with a thickness.
February 9, 2022 at 5:56 pmtungseng99
SubscriberHi Rob, Thank you so much for your reply!
I have modeled the concrete floor and ground as solid volumes. I have a question about setting up the wall boundary condition.
I understand that the top surface of the ground that interacts with the air domain will be as coupled wall. But for the sidewalls and bottom surface of the ground, should I set them as adiabatic or constant temperature?
Besides that, I'm running a steady state simulation, do I need to patch different temperatures to both of the solid cell zones of the concrete floor and ground?
February 10, 2022 at 1:41 pmRob
Ansys EmployeeAdiabatic is probably OK for the sides of the solid, they should be far enough away from the area of interest to not do much to the solution. If the system is steady it'll reach the equilibrium result eventually, so while patching in values will speed this up they probably won't affect the outcome of the model.
Viewing 5 reply threads- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Ansys Innovation SpaceBoost Ansys Fluent Simulations with AWS
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) helps engineers design products in which the flow of fluid components is a significant challenge. These different use cases often require large complex models to solve on a traditional workstation. Click here to join this event to learn how to leverage Ansys Fluids on the cloud, thanks to Ansys Gateway powered by AWS.
Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.
Ansys Blog
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
Trending discussions- Suppress Fluent to open with GUI while performing in journal file
- Floating point exception in Fluent
- What are the differences between CFX and Fluent?
- Heat transfer coefficient
- Getting graph and tabular data from result in workbench mechanical
- Difference between K-epsilon and K-omega Turbulence Model
- The solver failed with a non-zero exit code of : 2
- Time Step Size and Courant Number
- Mesh Interfaces in ANSYS FLUENT
- error: Received signal SIGSEGV
Top Contributors-
5290
-
3311
-
2471
-
1308
-
1016
Top Rated Tags© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.
Ansys does not support the usage of unauthorized Ansys software. Please visit www.ansys.com to obtain an official distribution.
-